Abstract 2196
Background
Despite decades of research, performance of DPYD genotyping to predict FP toxicity (tox) is poorly documented. GPCO-UNICANCER and RNPGx groups initiated the FUSAFE MA on individual patient data (IPD) to assess the prognostic value of consensual deleterious DPYD variants on grade (G) 4-5 FP tox.
Methods
Eligibility criteria included unbiased recruitment of Caucasian patients (pts) without FP dose adjustment based on DPD status. Main endpoint was 12 weeks hematological or digestive G4-5 tox. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), advanced stage (M- vs M+), FP drug (5FU vs capecitabine), FP administration (bolus±continuous vs continuous alone or p.o.) and associated anticancer drugs (AAD) were collected. Multivariable logistic models were applied. Performance was assessed by AUC and diagnostic indices maximizing Youden index.
Results
From the 18 identified eligible studies (10230 pts), 14 were included (9030 pts), with complete IPD collected for 6403 pts (84% colorectal, 16% M+, 66% 5FU, 80% AAD). G4-5 tox prevalence was 8% (518 events). DPYD variants *2A, D949V, *13 and HapB3 were carried by 0.9%, 1.2%, 0.2% and 3.9% of pts, respectively. The clinical model (M1) retained age, sex, BMI, FP-administration, AAD. Adding variants *2A/D949V/*13 (at least one mutated allele) significantly (p<.0001) improved the model (M2). Further adding HapB3 did not improve the model (p=.24, M3). M3-adjusted OR (95%CI) was 10.0 (6.9-14.7) for the 3 variants *2A/D949V/*13 and 2.1 (1.4-3.0) for HapB3. Similar results were observed on colorectal pts only, or when excluding bolus administration alone.Table:
569P
Model | AUC (area under the curve) | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | 0.725 | 69.7% | 65.4% | 15.1% | 96.1% |
M2 | 0.750 | 75.5% | 62.8% | 15.2% | 96.7% |
M3 | 0.752 | 76.4% | 61.9% | 15.0% | 96.8% |
Conclusions
This is the largest MA on DPYD genotyping and toxicity. It shows the relevance of clinical variables and of the 3 consensual DPYD variants. Despite its association with tox, HapB3 does not improve the discriminant ability to identify pts at risk of G4-5 toxicity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France (Dr Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi, coordinator).
Funding
French Cancer Institute (INCa) funding (PHRC-K 14-193 FUSAFE) and French Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer.
Disclosure
V. Boige: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck Serono; Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche Genentech; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Prestizia; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi. J. Taieb: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Lily; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Sirtex; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. D. Meulendijks: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca UK. C. Palles: Advisory / Consultancy: Oxford Cancer Biomarkers. U. Zanger: Licensing / Royalties: Robert Bosch GmbH. M. Boisdron-Celle: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Licensing / Royalties, Officer / Board of Directors: ODPM. A. Marinaki: Full / Part-time employment: Viapath. E. Gross: Licensing / Royalties: Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universitat Munchen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2840 - Effects of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise on Android:Gynoid Fat Ratio in Breast Cancer Survivors
Presenter: Christina Dieli-Conwright
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
869 - Impact of Education for Breast self examination in Rural Indian Women on Early Detection - results of POC study
Presenter: Sneha Parchuri
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1951 - Breast cancer incidence and survival in renal transplant patients: 35-year experience
Presenter: Michalis Kontos
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2017 - The changing landscape of breast cancer incidence after treatment for Hodgkin’s disease
Presenter: Amelia Benjamin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1780 - Number of deliveries as a prognostic factor in different breast cancer subtypes
Presenter: Anniina Jääskeläinen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4650 - Effects of supervised and adapted exercise program in the quality of life and strength of breast cancer survivors: MAMA MOVE Gaia trial
Presenter: Ana Joaquim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4962 - Study On the Socioeconomic and Clinical Factors Affecting the Proportion of Breast Conserving Surgery in Chinese Women Breast Cancer
Presenter: Jin Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5451 - Clinical decision making and multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs) in early breast cancer. Is the agreement between planned and applied therapeutic program?
Presenter: Marco Giavarra
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
888 - The value of genetic counselling in breast cancer genetic testing and clinical management
Presenter: Vicki Kiesel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4005 - Elderly patients in the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry
Presenter: Masataka Sawaki
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract