Abstract 2196
Background
Despite decades of research, performance of DPYD genotyping to predict FP toxicity (tox) is poorly documented. GPCO-UNICANCER and RNPGx groups initiated the FUSAFE MA on individual patient data (IPD) to assess the prognostic value of consensual deleterious DPYD variants on grade (G) 4-5 FP tox.
Methods
Eligibility criteria included unbiased recruitment of Caucasian patients (pts) without FP dose adjustment based on DPD status. Main endpoint was 12 weeks hematological or digestive G4-5 tox. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), advanced stage (M- vs M+), FP drug (5FU vs capecitabine), FP administration (bolus±continuous vs continuous alone or p.o.) and associated anticancer drugs (AAD) were collected. Multivariable logistic models were applied. Performance was assessed by AUC and diagnostic indices maximizing Youden index.
Results
From the 18 identified eligible studies (10230 pts), 14 were included (9030 pts), with complete IPD collected for 6403 pts (84% colorectal, 16% M+, 66% 5FU, 80% AAD). G4-5 tox prevalence was 8% (518 events). DPYD variants *2A, D949V, *13 and HapB3 were carried by 0.9%, 1.2%, 0.2% and 3.9% of pts, respectively. The clinical model (M1) retained age, sex, BMI, FP-administration, AAD. Adding variants *2A/D949V/*13 (at least one mutated allele) significantly (p<.0001) improved the model (M2). Further adding HapB3 did not improve the model (p=.24, M3). M3-adjusted OR (95%CI) was 10.0 (6.9-14.7) for the 3 variants *2A/D949V/*13 and 2.1 (1.4-3.0) for HapB3. Similar results were observed on colorectal pts only, or when excluding bolus administration alone.Table:
569P
Model | AUC (area under the curve) | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | 0.725 | 69.7% | 65.4% | 15.1% | 96.1% |
M2 | 0.750 | 75.5% | 62.8% | 15.2% | 96.7% |
M3 | 0.752 | 76.4% | 61.9% | 15.0% | 96.8% |
Conclusions
This is the largest MA on DPYD genotyping and toxicity. It shows the relevance of clinical variables and of the 3 consensual DPYD variants. Despite its association with tox, HapB3 does not improve the discriminant ability to identify pts at risk of G4-5 toxicity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France (Dr Marie-Christine Etienne-Grimaldi, coordinator).
Funding
French Cancer Institute (INCa) funding (PHRC-K 14-193 FUSAFE) and French Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer.
Disclosure
V. Boige: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck Serono; Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche Genentech; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy: Prestizia; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi. J. Taieb: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Lily; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Advisory / Consultancy: Sirtex; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. D. Meulendijks: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca UK. C. Palles: Advisory / Consultancy: Oxford Cancer Biomarkers. U. Zanger: Licensing / Royalties: Robert Bosch GmbH. M. Boisdron-Celle: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Licensing / Royalties, Officer / Board of Directors: ODPM. A. Marinaki: Full / Part-time employment: Viapath. E. Gross: Licensing / Royalties: Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universitat Munchen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3278 - Immune-Related Gene Expression Profiling after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) of Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma
Presenter: Luis Manso
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4906 - Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A restrospective study
Presenter: Sara Giovannoni
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3919 - Prognostic significance of elements of the adaptive immunity in the microenvironment of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Presenter: Periklis Foukas
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5139 - Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts platinum sensitivity in epithelial ovarian cancer patients: a MITO24 retrospective study
Presenter: Alberto Farolfi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4212 - The prognostic impact of monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)
Presenter: Marc Cucurull Salamero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5123 - TP53 Hotspot mutations as immunoreactive neoantigens define a signature with differential survival outcomes in advanced ovarian cancer
Presenter: Marica Garziera
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3795 - Use of bevacizumab (Bev) in real life for first-line (fl) treatment of ovarian cancer (OC)/ The GINECO ENCOURAGE cohort of 500 French patients
Presenter: Dominique Berton-Rigaud
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2359 - Phase II study: Letrozole maintenance therapy after first line chemotherapy in patients with advanced serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer
Presenter: Alexandra Tyulyandina
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3619 - Baseline IPI (Immune Prognostic Index) predicts survival in patients with advanced cervical cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).
Presenter: Felix Blanc-Durand
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3474 - Preselecting tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subsets to implement adoptive inmmunotherapy in ovarian cancer
Presenter: Diego Salas-Benito
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract