Abstract 3456
Background
Tumor pathologists classify tumors according to cell-level and tissue-level criteria, using molecular markers in addition to morphological patterns, as reported in WHO tumor classifications. Their work describes to some extent both inter-tumor and intra-tumor heterogeneity, but it is a tedious task with potential reproducibility issues. The molecular subtyping of tumors represents a sometimes parallel and sometimes convergent effort to describe the heterogeneity of tumors. It is automated, which attenuates the limitations of pathological scoring mentioned above, but so far it is poorly adapted to describe intra-tumor heterogeneity.
Methods
We propose a novel method, WISP (Weighted In Silico Pathology), which finely measures intra-tumor heterogeneity by automatically estimating the proportions of cell types present in a bulk tumor sample, these cell types being predefined based on histological or high-throughput molecular criterions.
Results
We illustrate the relevance of our approach in several tumor types including lung cancer, glioblastoma and pancreatic cancer. We show that the cell types that describe tumors for a given cancer type can fairly well recapitulate existing molecular classifications and are very consistent with an independent pathological scoring. We show that our method offers a more standardized and finer-grained solution for describing tumor heterogeneity than either pathological scoring or molecular subtyping. More importantly, we show that the proportion of certain cell types is strongly associated to prognosis and drug response.
Conclusions
This study provides a framework for standardized molecular pathology and fully reshapes the way in which we think about pathology or molecular subtyping. We believe that our results are a proof of concept demonstrating the importance of considering cell types intra-tumor proportions for personalized clinical care.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
CIT Program - Ligue Contre le Cancer.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4321 - Health-related quality of life of advanced melanoma survivors treated with CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibition: a matched cohort study
Presenter: Annelies Boekhout
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
779 - Capecitabine vs Cisplatin along with concurrent radiotherapy in the treatment of inoperable lower esophageal cancers focusing on TWISTT score and QOL
Presenter: Goutham Anugu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5914 - Cancer, Mental Health and End Life Simulation (CAMhELS): A novel effectiveness evaluation.
Presenter: Asanga Fernando
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2597 - Cancer patients’ expectations and understanding about their disease
Presenter: Mónica Pinho
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5187 - Impact of patients’ death on oncologists and coping strategies: An online survey
Presenter: Soumaya Labidi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4579 - Clinical benefit from late lines of therapy offered to patients treated in a tertiary referral centre
Presenter: Andrea Sbrana
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5058 - Preparedness for caregiving in caregivers of cancer patients
Presenter: Hatice Yakar
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5917 - Oncologic Emergency Medicine in the real world: A survey and proposal for improvement
Presenter: Carintia Dorta Pérez
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4077 - The Reality of Critical Cancer Patients in a Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit
Presenter: Tiago Filipe Da Cruz Tomas
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1728 - A phase III trial evaluating olanzapine 5 mg for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving cisplatin: J-FORCE Study
Presenter: Hironobu Hashimoto
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract