Abstract 857
Background
Colonoscopy is recommended as preferred test for first-degree relatives (FDRs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, colonoscopy screening rate remains low. A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by the research team show that tailored communication is an effective approach to increase uptake of colonoscopy. However, the decision rules that guide the tailored process remain unclear. Based on the identified evidences, a mHealth intervention with an integrated tailoring decision system was developed. This study aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of this mHealth intervention in Chinese FDRs.
Methods
A single-blinded, family-based cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted. 20 families with CRC patients were randomized to intervention (10 families, n = 11) or control group (10 families, n = 10). Intervention consists of 3 sessions that provided tailored cancer and screening messages on response of personal assessment. All participants received an e-brochure on CRC and CRC screening. Feasibility was measured by recruitment and completion rate, whereas acceptability was assessed by a self-developed questionnaire.
Results
34.5% of eligible family members agreed to participate. 70% of participants completed the trial and all of them completed 3 sessions. All the participants satisfied with the intervention, and agreed the intervention help them understand their risks and appropriate screening recommendations. The main reason for low recruitment rate is that cancer cases were contacted through phone to identify FDRs. Even this is a common strategy when conducting family trials, it is difficult to obtain the trust of FDRs by phone due to the adverse influence of phone scam.
Conclusions
It is acceptable to provide mHealth intervention to Chinese FDRs. However, family recruitment utilizing cancer registry-identified cases seems less feasible in Chinese population. Recruitment through direct contact with FDRs is recommended, for example, through current screening program or clinical units. Furthermore, a definitive trial to test the effectiveness of developed intervention is warranted.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bai Yang.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2901 - IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio as predictive biomarker for response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients
Presenter: Emilio Giunta
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2306 - Multiplex Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Spatial Analysis of Checkpoint-Positive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs)
Presenter: Scott Ely
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1678 - The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Presenter: Alberto Carretero-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5138 - Radiomic Features as a Non-invasive Biomarker to Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Presenter: Kye Jin Park
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5800 - Integrative combination of high-plex digital profiling techniques and cluster analysis to reveal complex immune biology in the tumor microenvironment of mesothelioma
Presenter: Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5736 - Predictive factors of response to immunotherapy in 198 patients with metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer (mNSCLC): real world data from 2 university hospitals in Spain
Presenter: Juan Felipe Cordoba Ortega
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5645 - Evaluating Lung CT Density Changes Among Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Treated with Thoracic Radiotherapy (TRT) alone or TRT Followed by Combined Ipilimumab (IPI) and Nivolumab (NIVO).
Presenter: Kujtim Latifi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1540 - Immuno-oncology therapy biomarkers differences between polyoma-virus positive and negative Merkel cell carcinomas
Presenter: Zoran Gatalica
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4538 - Can we improve patient selection for phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1) based on Immuno-Oncology score prognostic index (VIO)?
Presenter: Ignacio Matos Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5544 - Evaluation of a radiomic signature of CD8 cells in patients treated with immunotherapy-radiotherapy in three clinical trials.
Presenter: Roger Sun
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract