Abstract 1793
Background
Changes to the AJCC melanoma staging system eighth edition (AJCC-8) should be independently validated to assess its prognostic performance compared with the seventh edition (AJCC-7) in accurately staging melanoma.
Methods
We used the SEER-18 registry from 2010 to 2015 to extract patient-, tumour-related and survival data. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for AJCC-7 and AJCC-8. Cumulative hazard functions were computed using Nelson-Aalen function.
Results
Of 126,408 individuals, 59,989 (47%) and 60,411 (48%) had available data for pathological and clinical stage OS analysis, respectively. The 12-month OS for AJCC-7 among pathologically staged patients were: stage IA 99%, stage IB 99%, stage IIA 96%, stage IIB 94%, stage IIC 87%, stage IIIA 98%, stage IIIB 94%, stage IIIC 82% and stage IV 41%. The 12-month OS for AJCC-8 patients was similar to AJCC-7 but was 88% for stage IIIC and 65% for stage IIID. The 12-month risk of dying for pathological stage IIIC was 13% compared to 41% for pathological stage IIID (p < 0.001). Stage IV individuals with an elevated LDH had worse OS and CSS at all other measured time-points up to 60 months compared to those with a normal LDH. Stage IV individuals with brain metastases (M1d) also had worse OS and CSS at all other measured time-points up to 60 months compared to other stage IV subgroups.
Conclusions
The discriminatory ability of the AJCC-7 and AJCC-8 melanoma staging system appear comparable. Changes in AJCC-8 identifies individuals with a poorer prognostic within new subgroups. These include the subgroups of stage IIID and M1d within stage IV individuals, and the addition of elevated LDH as a prognostic marker in stage IV disease. However, advanced T stage, node-negative tumours experienced worse survival compared with earlier T stage, node-positive tumours requiring further research to evaluate the underlying biology of these tumour subgroups.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5579 - Quality of informed consent in clinical trials patients
Presenter: Gianluca Catania
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5147 - Patient's rights: Where do we stand?
Presenter: Maja Kozuh
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1279 - The oncology nurse coordinator’s role in a digestive oncology department: Impact on patient and hospital
Presenter: Fouad Awada
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1670 - Nursing model for a breast cancer unit at the Catalan Institute of Oncology
Presenter: Ana Rodriguez-ortega
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3936 - Role of cancer nurse in the prevention and control of acute deterioration for oncohematologic patient
Presenter: Raquel Azor Portolés
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2789 - Standardized nursing care in the department of radiotherapy of a network of cancer centres
Presenter: José Delgado
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4482 - Exploring anxiety, depression and quality of life of ambulatory cancer patients during chemotherapy.
Presenter: Theodoula Adamakidou
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3075 - Implementing a Cancer Survivorship Program for Individuals with Recurrent Breast Cancer
Presenter: Darcy Burbage
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3869 - The perceptions of parents/guardians regarding their child/adolescent’s experience of reflexology or non-specific foot massage The perceptions of parents/guardians regarding their child/adolescents experience of reflexology or non-specific foot massage
Presenter: Patricia Fox
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4064 - Quality of life in survivors of adult haematological malignancies
Presenter: Anita Immanuel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract