Abstract 1793
Background
Changes to the AJCC melanoma staging system eighth edition (AJCC-8) should be independently validated to assess its prognostic performance compared with the seventh edition (AJCC-7) in accurately staging melanoma.
Methods
We used the SEER-18 registry from 2010 to 2015 to extract patient-, tumour-related and survival data. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for AJCC-7 and AJCC-8. Cumulative hazard functions were computed using Nelson-Aalen function.
Results
Of 126,408 individuals, 59,989 (47%) and 60,411 (48%) had available data for pathological and clinical stage OS analysis, respectively. The 12-month OS for AJCC-7 among pathologically staged patients were: stage IA 99%, stage IB 99%, stage IIA 96%, stage IIB 94%, stage IIC 87%, stage IIIA 98%, stage IIIB 94%, stage IIIC 82% and stage IV 41%. The 12-month OS for AJCC-8 patients was similar to AJCC-7 but was 88% for stage IIIC and 65% for stage IIID. The 12-month risk of dying for pathological stage IIIC was 13% compared to 41% for pathological stage IIID (p < 0.001). Stage IV individuals with an elevated LDH had worse OS and CSS at all other measured time-points up to 60 months compared to those with a normal LDH. Stage IV individuals with brain metastases (M1d) also had worse OS and CSS at all other measured time-points up to 60 months compared to other stage IV subgroups.
Conclusions
The discriminatory ability of the AJCC-7 and AJCC-8 melanoma staging system appear comparable. Changes in AJCC-8 identifies individuals with a poorer prognostic within new subgroups. These include the subgroups of stage IIID and M1d within stage IV individuals, and the addition of elevated LDH as a prognostic marker in stage IV disease. However, advanced T stage, node-negative tumours experienced worse survival compared with earlier T stage, node-positive tumours requiring further research to evaluate the underlying biology of these tumour subgroups.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5822 - Greek nursing students experience facing death in clinical practice
Presenter: Maria Dimoula
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2866 - HOPEVOL: Hospice care appropriate to the wishes and needs of patients in the palliative terminal phase.
Presenter: Merel van Klinken
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
829 - Mindfulness-based stress reduction in early palliative care for advanced cancer patients : an italian single-centre study. MINDEEP
Presenter: Emilia Gianotti
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2702 - Optimising Inpatient Oncology Care
Presenter: Lisa Judge
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1527 - Analysis on the Implementation Results of Family Sickbed for Oncology Patients in Dongshi Township Health Centers from 2015 to 2017
Presenter: Yayu Huang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2054 - Exploring needs for palliative care and quality of life for oncology patients with advanced disease who undergo radiotherapy
Presenter: Foteini Antonopoulou
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5605 - Cytotoxic contamination in cancer care settings – Risks and safety awareness among cancer nurses
Presenter: Sandra Lundman Vikberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5769 - Understanding Chemotherapy - group education sessions prior to commencing chemotherapy
Presenter: Aileen McHale
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2620 - Estimation of HPQ-based absenteeism and presenteeism in cancer patients via ResearchKit
Presenter: Shunsuke Kondo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4705 - Identifying falls-related variables and risk factors in hospitalised cancer patients
Presenter: Maria Montserrat Martí Dillet
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract