Abstract 1121
Background
For patients diagnosed with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, endocrine therapy (ET) is prescribed, which reduces recurrence and mortality rates (Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group, 2011). Despite the prognostic benefits of ET, the adherence to treatment varies, and 30%–70% of the patients discontinue their treatment within five years (Daly et al., 2017; Tinari et al., 2015; Ursem et al., 2015), often during their first year of treatment (He et al., 2015), due to the fact that ET is associated with adverse side-effects (Regan et al., 2011).
Methods
The study was conducted in a surgical out-patient care unit at a hospital in Sweden. Inclusion criteria were women diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with ET after surgery. Forty-eight patients were invited to participate, of which 23 declined, thus 25 women were included. Seven focus group interviews, with two to five participants in each group, were conducted using an interview guide according to Krueger’s (2014) strategy. The interview guide contained six open-ended questions aiming to explore the women’s experiences of ET after breast cancer surgery. Inductive qualitative content analysis was used (Graneheim & Lundman, 2004).
Results
The analysis resulted in three categories that described the women’s experiences: the treatment “creates discomfort”; “promotes levels of management”; and “causes feelings of abandonment”. Women’s experiences of treatment could at first glance be seen as positive, as perceived protection, but after further analysis, a deeper meaning was identified: protection with reservation. When experiencing discomfort, the women were urged to manage the situation, although the mode of management sometimes varied. The women reported that they needed support, but when the support did not appear, they felt as though they had been abandoned. Moreover, knowledge about side-effects became an obstacle. The participants described feeling abandoned, but they also described their disease as “cancer light”.
Conclusions
Professionals need to explore the pre-knowledge and preconceptions that patients might have. This could be achieved by listening to the patient before providing them with information. The information needs to be customized specifically to each person.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
wileyeditingservices.com
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Assar Gabrielsson’s Foundation, Herbert and Karin Jacobsson’s Foundation, and the Swedish Society of Nursing.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5877 - Efficacy of anti-PD(L)1 treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer based on mRNA- and protein- based PD-L1 determination: Results from the multicentric, retrospective FOsMIC trial
Presenter: Jonas Jarczyk
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5204 - A differential bladder microbiota composition is associated with tumor grade in bladder cancer.
Presenter: Monica Parra-Grande
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4904 - Molecular characterization of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in prior or current smokers (PCS) vs non-smokers (NS)
Presenter: Victor Sacristan Santos
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5370 - Evaluation of different diagnostic methods for identification of FGFR alteration in advanced urothelial carcinomas: Proficiency Results based on multiple RNA extraction kits and mutation detection methods
Presenter: Veronika Weyerer
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2579 - Title: Genomic characterization of non-schistosomiasis-related squamous cell carcinoma (NSR-SCC) of the urinary bladder: a retrospective study of potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers
Presenter: Esmail Al-ezzi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2203 - TiNivo: Tivozanib combined with nivolumab results in prolonged progression free survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Final Results.
Presenter: Philippe Barthelemy
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4712 - First-Line Pembrolizumab (pembro) Monotherapy for Advanced Non‒Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (nccRCC): Updated Follow-Up for KEYNOTE-427 Cohort B
Presenter: Cristina Suárez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2091 - First-Line Pembrolizumab (pembro) Monotherapy in Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC): Updated Follow-Up For KEYNOTE-427 Cohort A
Presenter: James Larkin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2368 - Association Between Depth of Response and Overall Survival: Exploratory Analysis in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (aRCC) in CheckMate 214
Presenter: Viktor Grünwald
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6008 - Quality of life in previously untreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) in CheckMate 214: updated results
Presenter: David Cella
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract