Abstract 1121
Background
For patients diagnosed with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, endocrine therapy (ET) is prescribed, which reduces recurrence and mortality rates (Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group, 2011). Despite the prognostic benefits of ET, the adherence to treatment varies, and 30%–70% of the patients discontinue their treatment within five years (Daly et al., 2017; Tinari et al., 2015; Ursem et al., 2015), often during their first year of treatment (He et al., 2015), due to the fact that ET is associated with adverse side-effects (Regan et al., 2011).
Methods
The study was conducted in a surgical out-patient care unit at a hospital in Sweden. Inclusion criteria were women diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with ET after surgery. Forty-eight patients were invited to participate, of which 23 declined, thus 25 women were included. Seven focus group interviews, with two to five participants in each group, were conducted using an interview guide according to Krueger’s (2014) strategy. The interview guide contained six open-ended questions aiming to explore the women’s experiences of ET after breast cancer surgery. Inductive qualitative content analysis was used (Graneheim & Lundman, 2004).
Results
The analysis resulted in three categories that described the women’s experiences: the treatment “creates discomfort”; “promotes levels of management”; and “causes feelings of abandonment”. Women’s experiences of treatment could at first glance be seen as positive, as perceived protection, but after further analysis, a deeper meaning was identified: protection with reservation. When experiencing discomfort, the women were urged to manage the situation, although the mode of management sometimes varied. The women reported that they needed support, but when the support did not appear, they felt as though they had been abandoned. Moreover, knowledge about side-effects became an obstacle. The participants described feeling abandoned, but they also described their disease as “cancer light”.
Conclusions
Professionals need to explore the pre-knowledge and preconceptions that patients might have. This could be achieved by listening to the patient before providing them with information. The information needs to be customized specifically to each person.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
wileyeditingservices.com
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Assar Gabrielsson’s Foundation, Herbert and Karin Jacobsson’s Foundation, and the Swedish Society of Nursing.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5650 - Tissue-based activation of mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells in combination ipilimumab and nivolumab checkpoint inhibitor (CI) colitis.
Presenter: Sarah Sasson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5944 - Significance of severe immune-related adverse effects (irAE) on patients with advanced tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors being admitted for secondary toxicity: Clinical relevance and next steps
Presenter: Leyre Zubiri
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5989 - Implementation of a dedicated immuno-oncology toxicity service reduces the acute impact of immune-related adverse events
Presenter: Anna Olsson-Brown
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3267 - Cardiotoxic and pro-inflammatory effects induced by the association of immune checkpoint inhibitor Pembrolizumab and Trastuzumab in preclinical models
Presenter: Nicola Maurea
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3417 - Interstitial lung disease associated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors in malignant diseases
Presenter: Akira Yamagata
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2071 - A Phase 1 Study of Intraperitoneal MCY-M11 Anti-Mesothelin CAR for Women with Platinum Resistant High Grade Serous Adenocarcinoma of the Ovary, Primary Peritoneum, or Fallopian Tube, or Subjects with Peritoneal Mesothelioma with Recurrence after Prior Chemotherapy
Presenter: Christina Annunziata
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4935 - Trial in progress: First-in-human study of a novel anti-NY-ESO-1–anti-CD3, TCR-based bispecific (IMCnyeso) as monotherapy in NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1A-positive advanced solid tumors (IMCnyeso-101)
Presenter: Juanita Lopez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5613 - Nimotuzumab-Cisplatin-Radiation versus Cisplatin-Radiation in HPV negative oropharyngeal cancer
Presenter: Kumar Prabhash
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2576 - Interim analysis of a single arm phase 2 study of adjuvant nivolumab after salvage resection in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients previously treated with definitive therapy.
Presenter: Trisha Wise-draper
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4758 - A Phase I Study of the CDK4/6 Inhibitor, Palbociclib in combination with Cetuximab and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN); A Result of Dose Escalation Cohort
Presenter: Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract