Abstract 1121
Background
For patients diagnosed with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, endocrine therapy (ET) is prescribed, which reduces recurrence and mortality rates (Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group, 2011). Despite the prognostic benefits of ET, the adherence to treatment varies, and 30%–70% of the patients discontinue their treatment within five years (Daly et al., 2017; Tinari et al., 2015; Ursem et al., 2015), often during their first year of treatment (He et al., 2015), due to the fact that ET is associated with adverse side-effects (Regan et al., 2011).
Methods
The study was conducted in a surgical out-patient care unit at a hospital in Sweden. Inclusion criteria were women diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with ET after surgery. Forty-eight patients were invited to participate, of which 23 declined, thus 25 women were included. Seven focus group interviews, with two to five participants in each group, were conducted using an interview guide according to Krueger’s (2014) strategy. The interview guide contained six open-ended questions aiming to explore the women’s experiences of ET after breast cancer surgery. Inductive qualitative content analysis was used (Graneheim & Lundman, 2004).
Results
The analysis resulted in three categories that described the women’s experiences: the treatment “creates discomfort”; “promotes levels of management”; and “causes feelings of abandonment”. Women’s experiences of treatment could at first glance be seen as positive, as perceived protection, but after further analysis, a deeper meaning was identified: protection with reservation. When experiencing discomfort, the women were urged to manage the situation, although the mode of management sometimes varied. The women reported that they needed support, but when the support did not appear, they felt as though they had been abandoned. Moreover, knowledge about side-effects became an obstacle. The participants described feeling abandoned, but they also described their disease as “cancer light”.
Conclusions
Professionals need to explore the pre-knowledge and preconceptions that patients might have. This could be achieved by listening to the patient before providing them with information. The information needs to be customized specifically to each person.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
wileyeditingservices.com
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Assar Gabrielsson’s Foundation, Herbert and Karin Jacobsson’s Foundation, and the Swedish Society of Nursing.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3186 - The landscape of immuno-oncology clinical trials in China
Presenter: Dawei Wu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3468 - Clinical Significance of Immune-related Creatine Phosphokinase Increase Associated with Anti PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapies.
Presenter: Samia Hajem
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3836 - Thyroid toxicity and anti-thyroid antibodies as predictive markers for patients treated with anti-PD1 checkpoint therapy
Presenter: Wim Meer
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1343 - Treatment-related adverse events and tolerability in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line combination therapy with checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Thura Win Htut
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5783 - Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with single-agent PD-1 vs PD-L1 inhibitors: a meta-analysis of 8,730 patients from clinical trials
Presenter: Guru Sonpavde
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5422 - EULAR recommendations for the diagnosis and the management of rheumatic immune-related adverse events due to cancer immunotherapy
Presenter: Marie Kostine
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1202 - Radiographic characteristics and poor prognostic factors of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in nivolumab-treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Shinichi Sasaki
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2749 - Use of Checkpoint Inhibitors (CPI) in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: An Institutional Experience and A Systemic Review of the Literature
Presenter: Chantal Saberian
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3256 - Deep Learning Radiomics distinguishes intrapulmonary Disease from Metastases in Immunotherapy-treated Melanoma Patients
Presenter: Thi Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5031 - Sarcoidosis-Like Reaction Mimics Progression in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Sophie Hans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract