Abstract 1121
Background
For patients diagnosed with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, endocrine therapy (ET) is prescribed, which reduces recurrence and mortality rates (Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group, 2011). Despite the prognostic benefits of ET, the adherence to treatment varies, and 30%–70% of the patients discontinue their treatment within five years (Daly et al., 2017; Tinari et al., 2015; Ursem et al., 2015), often during their first year of treatment (He et al., 2015), due to the fact that ET is associated with adverse side-effects (Regan et al., 2011).
Methods
The study was conducted in a surgical out-patient care unit at a hospital in Sweden. Inclusion criteria were women diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with ET after surgery. Forty-eight patients were invited to participate, of which 23 declined, thus 25 women were included. Seven focus group interviews, with two to five participants in each group, were conducted using an interview guide according to Krueger’s (2014) strategy. The interview guide contained six open-ended questions aiming to explore the women’s experiences of ET after breast cancer surgery. Inductive qualitative content analysis was used (Graneheim & Lundman, 2004).
Results
The analysis resulted in three categories that described the women’s experiences: the treatment “creates discomfort”; “promotes levels of management”; and “causes feelings of abandonment”. Women’s experiences of treatment could at first glance be seen as positive, as perceived protection, but after further analysis, a deeper meaning was identified: protection with reservation. When experiencing discomfort, the women were urged to manage the situation, although the mode of management sometimes varied. The women reported that they needed support, but when the support did not appear, they felt as though they had been abandoned. Moreover, knowledge about side-effects became an obstacle. The participants described feeling abandoned, but they also described their disease as “cancer light”.
Conclusions
Professionals need to explore the pre-knowledge and preconceptions that patients might have. This could be achieved by listening to the patient before providing them with information. The information needs to be customized specifically to each person.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
wileyeditingservices.com
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Assar Gabrielsson’s Foundation, Herbert and Karin Jacobsson’s Foundation, and the Swedish Society of Nursing.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4290 - Characterization of the mechanism of action and efficacy of MEN1611 (PA799), a novel PI3K inhibitor, in breast cancer preclinical models.
Presenter: Alessio Fiascarelli
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2167 - Neat-1: culprit lnRNA tying PIG-C, MSLN, CD80 in TNBC
Presenter: Nada Hussein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1829 - A novel RAF/MEK inhibitor CH5126766 in phase 1 clinical trial has an effectiveness in the combination with eribulin for the treatment of triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Hisako Ono
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4357 - Identification of a stemness-related gene panel associated with BET inhibition in triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Eva Galan-Moya
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5163 - Preclinical Evaluation targeting both IGF1R and IR in Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Presenter: Alex Eustace
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
832 - Monospecific antibody targeting of CDH11 inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and represses cancer stem cell-like phenotype by up-regulating miR-335 in metastatic breast cancer, in vitro and in vivo.
Presenter: Jia-Hong Chen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3781 - Pharmacological screening with Chk1 inhibitors identify synergistic agents to overcome resistance to platinums in basal breast and ovarian cancer
Presenter: Ana Lucia Sanabria
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3275 - Comparison of 11 circulating miRNAs and CA125 kinetics in ovarian cancer during first line treatment: data from the randomized CHIVA trial (a GINECO-GCIG study)
Presenter: Patrick Robelin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3391 - Inhibiting Ehmt2 and Ezh2 histone methyltransferases alters the immune microenvironment in a Trp53-/- murine ovarian cancer model
Presenter: Pavlina Spiliopoulou
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3839 - Fenofibrate impairs pro-tumorigenic potential of cancer stem cell-like cells within drug-resistant prostate cancer cell populations.
Presenter: Tomasz Wróbel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract