Abstract 1121
Background
For patients diagnosed with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, endocrine therapy (ET) is prescribed, which reduces recurrence and mortality rates (Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group, 2011). Despite the prognostic benefits of ET, the adherence to treatment varies, and 30%–70% of the patients discontinue their treatment within five years (Daly et al., 2017; Tinari et al., 2015; Ursem et al., 2015), often during their first year of treatment (He et al., 2015), due to the fact that ET is associated with adverse side-effects (Regan et al., 2011).
Methods
The study was conducted in a surgical out-patient care unit at a hospital in Sweden. Inclusion criteria were women diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with ET after surgery. Forty-eight patients were invited to participate, of which 23 declined, thus 25 women were included. Seven focus group interviews, with two to five participants in each group, were conducted using an interview guide according to Krueger’s (2014) strategy. The interview guide contained six open-ended questions aiming to explore the women’s experiences of ET after breast cancer surgery. Inductive qualitative content analysis was used (Graneheim & Lundman, 2004).
Results
The analysis resulted in three categories that described the women’s experiences: the treatment “creates discomfort”; “promotes levels of management”; and “causes feelings of abandonment”. Women’s experiences of treatment could at first glance be seen as positive, as perceived protection, but after further analysis, a deeper meaning was identified: protection with reservation. When experiencing discomfort, the women were urged to manage the situation, although the mode of management sometimes varied. The women reported that they needed support, but when the support did not appear, they felt as though they had been abandoned. Moreover, knowledge about side-effects became an obstacle. The participants described feeling abandoned, but they also described their disease as “cancer light”.
Conclusions
Professionals need to explore the pre-knowledge and preconceptions that patients might have. This could be achieved by listening to the patient before providing them with information. The information needs to be customized specifically to each person.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
wileyeditingservices.com
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Assar Gabrielsson’s Foundation, Herbert and Karin Jacobsson’s Foundation, and the Swedish Society of Nursing.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4837 - LRP2, a potential new biomarker for Chinese younger aged intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients
Presenter: Xiaoliang Shi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1286 - Reanalysis of the efficacy of molecular targeted agents (MTAs) given in the randomized trial SHIVA01 according to the ESMO ESCAT scale of actionability
Presenter: Aurelie Moreira
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2736 - Comparison of Platforms for Determining Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) From Blood Samples in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Jonathan Baden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5045 - Comprehensive Pan-Cancer analysis of somatic mutations in drug transporters to reveal acquired and intrinsic drug resistance in 3149 metastatic cancer patients
Presenter: Sander Bins
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4577 - Pan-Cancer Genomic Landscape of the Cyclin D1/FGF3,4,19 (11q13) Amplicon Including Associations with HPV Status, and ESR1 and AR Alterations
Presenter: Jennifer Johnson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5366 - Co-occurrence of NTRK fusions with other genomic biomarkers in cancer patients
Presenter: Xiaolong Jiao
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4084 - Prospective comparative study of next-generation sequencing on fine needle aspirations versus core needle biopsies in cancer patients included in SHIVA02 trial
Presenter: Julien Masliah-Planchon
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6017 - First national External Quality Assessement for the interpretation of somatic variants: assessment of 25 variants in colorectal, lung, ovarian cancers and melanoma in France
Presenter: Etienne Rouleau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2283 - Prospective testing of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic breast cancer facilitates clinical trial enrollment and precision oncology
Presenter: Andjelija Bujak
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5218 - Elevated driver mutational burden or number of perturbed pathways and poor response to abiraterone or enzalutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Presenter: Bram De Laere
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract