Abstract 1755
Background
PAN26 was developed as a supplement to the EORTC QLQ-C30 to assess pancreatic cancer–specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues. Despite its use in clinical trials, PAN26 MID has not been established. In undertaking the most comprehensive evaluation to date of PAN26’s measurement properties in patients with surgically resected pancreatic cancer receiving adjuvant therapy, we used distribution-based minimum detectable change (MDC) and anchor-based methods to determine PAN26 scale MIDs using the data collected during the Adjuvant Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Clinical Trial (APACT).
Methods
PAN26 and QLQ-C30 scores were assessed in 12-week intervals at screening (BL), middle and end of treatment, and up to 2.5 years of follow-up. MDC values were calculated via BL standard deviation (SD) and reliability-biased standard error of measurement approaches. Anchor-based values were determined via a linear mixed model in which QLQ-C30 overall health (OH; Item 29) served as a serial patient global impression of severity anchor for predicting PAN26 scores. Pattern-mixture models (PMM) were fit to assess the impact of attrition on estimates.
Results
MDC values were in the 12 to 15 range (Table). These findings were consistent with SD-based values inferred from earlier studies, although our results extended to standalone items. Anchor-based MIDs were almost twice as sensitive as MDC, with values in the 5 to 9 range (PMM values almost identical). Anchor values could not be inferred for the PAN26 bowel, hepatic, and healthcare scales and gas item due to their low (r < 0.30) correlation with OH.Table:
687P PAN26 anchor (QLQ-C30 overall health) and distribution-derived MID
Scale/Item | Anchor | Distribution | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | SE | 1/2 BLSD | SEM | |
Altered bowel habit | –a | 12.5 | 11.8 | |
Body image | 6.4 | 0.3 | 13.1 | 13.5 |
Digestive symptoms | 6.0 | 0.3 | 13.4 | 16.2 |
Hepatic | – a | 7.6 | 11.4 | |
Pancreatic pain | 5.6 | 0.2 | 9.7 | 9.7 |
Satisfaction with health care | – a | 12.1 | 15.3 | |
Sexual dysfunction | 5.4 | 0.4 | 17.3 | 19.7 |
Bloated | 4.9 | 0.3 | 12.8 | 15.9 |
Dry mouth | 5.1 | 0.3 | 13.4 | 15.6 |
Gas | – a | 14.5 | 16.2 | |
Indigestion | 4.8 | 0.3 | 12.8 | 15.7 |
Limited activities | 8.0 | 0.3 | 15.4 | 21.7 |
Low weight | 5.3 | 0.3 | 14.8 | 20.5 |
Taste different | 7.5 | 0.3 | 13.6 | 19.7 |
Troubled by tx adverse events | 8.8 | 0.3 | 12.6 | 15.8 |
Weak arms/legs | 9.1 | 0.3 | 13.1 | 15.7 |
Worried about future health | 6.3 | 0.3 | 15.5 | 16.3 |
BLSD, baseline standard deviation; SE, standard error; SEM, standard error of measurement (based on intraclass correlation).
aLow r (< 0.3) with overall health.
Conclusions
The MID estimates for PAN26 subscales can help clinicians and researchers interpret the changes in HRQoL and determine sample sizes in the design of future clinical trials.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Pharmerit International.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Celgene Corporation.
Disclosure
M. Reni: Non-remunerated activity/ies, Personal Fees: Celgene, Baxalta, Shire, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novocure, Novartis, AstraZeneca. J. Braverman: Full / Part-time employment: Celgene Corporation. T. Macarulla Mercade: Honoraria (self): Roche, Sanofi, Tesaro, Shire, Genzyme; Advisory / Consultancy: Baxalta, Celgene, H3B, QED, Shire; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Celgene, Sanofi/Aventis, Shire; Research grant / Funding (self): Agios, Aslan, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celgene, Genetech, Hallozyme, Immunomedics, Lilly, Merimarck, Millennium, Novartis, Novocure, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer, H3B, Merck, Sanofi. D. Oh: Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck Serono, Bayer, Taiho, ASLAN, Halozyme, Zymeworks; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Novartis, Array, Eli Lilly. H. Riess: Non-remunerated activity/ies, Personal Fees: Celgene, Roche, Shire. M.A. Tempero: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie, Advance Medical, BioPharm Communications, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Ignyta, Pharmacyslics, Pharmcyte Biotech, Tocagen; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, CPRIT, Immunovia; Research grant / Funding (institution): Halozyme. B. Lu: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Celgene Corporation. J. Marcus: Full / Part-time employment: Pharmerit international; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Celgene Corporation. N. Joshi: Full / Part-time employment: Pharmerit International; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene Corporation. M. Botterman: Honoraria (institution): Celgene, Bayer, Daiichi, BMS. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3059 - Intraoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU for colorectal cancer patients receiving curative resection (IOCCRC): A randomized, multicenter, prospective, phase III trial
Presenter: Rongxin Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3082 - Prognostic and predictive role of body mass index (BMI) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a pooled analisys of TRIBE and TRIBE-2 studies by GONO
Presenter: Emanuela Dell'Aquila
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3618 - Drug holidays and overall survival in patients treated for metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Silvio Ken Garattini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
6111 - Quality of life during 1st-line FOLFOXIRI+/- panitumumab in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from the randomized VOLFI trial (AIO KRK-0109)
Presenter: Michael Geissler
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1042 - A biomarker combination indicating resistance to FOLFOX plus bevacizumab in metastastic colorectal cancer : results of phase I of the PERMAD trial
Presenter: Thomas Seufferlein
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3291 - Microsatellite Instability (MSI) status and prognosis in colorectal cancer: meta-analysis
Presenter: James Toh
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2046 - Choosing the right strategy based on individualized treatment effect predictions: Combination versus sequential chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Presenter: Miriam Koopman
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2589 - Noninferiority on overall survival of every-2-weeks vs weekly schedule of cetuximab for first-line treatment of RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Stefan Kasper
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4944 - POLAF study: Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI/aflibercept in a phase II trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of plasmatic prognostic and predictive markers
Presenter: Maria Elena Elez Fernandez
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2042 - The accuracy of the clinical PCI score in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Nadine De Boer
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract