Abstract 4868
Background
AAP and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) treatment significantly improved overall survival (OS) and radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) in mCSPC pts with adverse prognostic factors. This analysis was aimed to identify predictive markers associated with response or resistance to AAP to guide combination and subsequent therapies.
Methods
DNA (n = 43) and RNA (n = 48) extracted from archived tumor samples from the LATITUDE study were sequenced using next generation and targeted DNA sequencing. Androgen receptor (AR) anomalies (copy number changes and mutations), frequency of DNA repair deficient (DRD: BRCA1/2, ATM, BRIP1, CHEK2, PALB2, FANCA, HDAC2) tumors and other resistant markers were probed. ARV7 expression was assessed in archived tumors (n = 105) by immunohistochemistry. Associations of biomarkers with rPFS and OS were assessed using univariate cox proportional hazards models.
Results
Of 105 treatment-naïve tumor samples tested, none of them met previously defined H-score cut off for ARV7 staining of > 5%, while 4/105 (4%) showed >1% ARV7 staining. A non-synonymous AR mutation (E654K) was detected in one sample (1/43), while none of the samples showed AR amplification. Impact of ARV7 expression on clinical outcomes was inconclusive due to small sample size of positive results. DRD tumors were observed at an overall frequency of 6/42 pts (14.3%: 4 biallelic), 4/30 pts (13.3%; 3 biallelic) in the AAP arm and 2/12 pts (16.7%: 1 biallelic) in control arm. Incidences of BRCA1/2 were only observed in AAP arm at a frequency of 2/30 (6.7%). In the AAP arm, shorter PFS was observed for DRD+ vs DRD– cohort (median 21.01 vs 24.14 mo; HR: 3.9; 95% CI: 1.1-12.1; p = 0.03). Genomic alterations were observed in PTEN (32.5%), TMPRSS2 (30%), TP53 (25.55), SPOP (20.9%) and APC (13.9%) genes, however, associations with clinical outcomes were not meaningful due to fewer samples and events.
Conclusions
AR splice variants and mutations were absent/rare in treatment naïve tumor samples from men with castrate-sensitive prostate cancers. The DRD+ cohort appears to show poorer rPFS outcome in AAP treated men.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01715285.
Editorial acknowledgement
Shweta Pitre, MPharm, ISMPP CMPP™ (SIRO Clinpharm Pvt. Ltd., India) provided writing assistance and Namit Ghildyal, PhD (Janssen Global Services, LLC) provided additional editorial support.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Janssen Research and Development, LLC.
Funding
Janssen Research and Development, LLC.
Disclosure
K.N. Chi: Research grant/Funding (self): Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma, Amgen, Bayer, Novartis, Sanofi, Exelixis, Tokai Pharmaceuticals, Oncogenex, Teva; Advisory/Consultancy: ESSA, Astellas Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Lilly/ImClone, Amgen, Bayer, Takeda Pharmaceuticals; Honoraria (self): Sanofi, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma. S. Thomas: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Janssen Research & Development. M. Gormley: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Janssen Research & Development. D. Shen: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Janssen Research & Development. S. Joshi: Full/Part-time employment: Janssen Research & Development. N. Tran: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Janssen Research & Development. M. Smith: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Janssen Research & Development. D. Ricci: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Janssen Research & Development. K. Fizazi: Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Amgen; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Astellas; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Bayer; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Clovis; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Curevac; Advisory / Consultancy, Received personal fees: Essa; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Genentech; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Janssen; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Merck Sharp and Dohme; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Orion; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Sanofi.
Resources from the same session
1885 - Factors associated with disease progression in patients treated with trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: an open label, non randomized study
Presenter: Philippe Saiag
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5259 - Integrative RNAseq and Target panel sequencing reveals common and distinct innate and adaptive resistance mechanisms to BRAF inhibitors
Presenter: Phil Cheng
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5619 - Effective treatment with T-VEC monotherapy in Stage IIIB/C-IVM1a Melanoma of the Head & Neck Region
Presenter: Viola Franke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5666 - Re-introduction of T-VEC Monotherapy in Recurrent Stage IIIB/C-IVM1a melanoma is effective
Presenter: Viola Franke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4117 - Efficacy of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in melanoma patients (pts) with locoregional (LR) recurrence, including in-transit metastases (ITM): subgroup analysis of the phase 3 OPTiM study
Presenter: Mark Middleton
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5303 - Real Life Use of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Melanoma in Centers in Austria and Switzeland
Presenter: Christoph Hoeller
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4130 - Outcomes of advanced melanoma patients who discontinued pembrolizumab (pembro) after complete response (CR) in the French early access program (EAP)
Presenter: Philippe Saiag
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2050 - Outcome of patients with elevated LDH treated with first-line targeted therapy (TT) or PD-1 based immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)
Presenter: Sarah Knispel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1618 - Comparative-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab vs. Nivolumab for Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Presenter: Justin Moser
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3556 - Long-term efficacy of combination nivolumab and ipilimumab for first-line treatment of advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis
Presenter: Peter Mohr
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract