Abstract 4868
Background
AAP and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) treatment significantly improved overall survival (OS) and radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) in mCSPC pts with adverse prognostic factors. This analysis was aimed to identify predictive markers associated with response or resistance to AAP to guide combination and subsequent therapies.
Methods
DNA (n = 43) and RNA (n = 48) extracted from archived tumor samples from the LATITUDE study were sequenced using next generation and targeted DNA sequencing. Androgen receptor (AR) anomalies (copy number changes and mutations), frequency of DNA repair deficient (DRD: BRCA1/2, ATM, BRIP1, CHEK2, PALB2, FANCA, HDAC2) tumors and other resistant markers were probed. ARV7 expression was assessed in archived tumors (n = 105) by immunohistochemistry. Associations of biomarkers with rPFS and OS were assessed using univariate cox proportional hazards models.
Results
Of 105 treatment-naïve tumor samples tested, none of them met previously defined H-score cut off for ARV7 staining of > 5%, while 4/105 (4%) showed >1% ARV7 staining. A non-synonymous AR mutation (E654K) was detected in one sample (1/43), while none of the samples showed AR amplification. Impact of ARV7 expression on clinical outcomes was inconclusive due to small sample size of positive results. DRD tumors were observed at an overall frequency of 6/42 pts (14.3%: 4 biallelic), 4/30 pts (13.3%; 3 biallelic) in the AAP arm and 2/12 pts (16.7%: 1 biallelic) in control arm. Incidences of BRCA1/2 were only observed in AAP arm at a frequency of 2/30 (6.7%). In the AAP arm, shorter PFS was observed for DRD+ vs DRD– cohort (median 21.01 vs 24.14 mo; HR: 3.9; 95% CI: 1.1-12.1; p = 0.03). Genomic alterations were observed in PTEN (32.5%), TMPRSS2 (30%), TP53 (25.55), SPOP (20.9%) and APC (13.9%) genes, however, associations with clinical outcomes were not meaningful due to fewer samples and events.
Conclusions
AR splice variants and mutations were absent/rare in treatment naïve tumor samples from men with castrate-sensitive prostate cancers. The DRD+ cohort appears to show poorer rPFS outcome in AAP treated men.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01715285.
Editorial acknowledgement
Shweta Pitre, MPharm, ISMPP CMPP™ (SIRO Clinpharm Pvt. Ltd., India) provided writing assistance and Namit Ghildyal, PhD (Janssen Global Services, LLC) provided additional editorial support.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Janssen Research and Development, LLC.
Funding
Janssen Research and Development, LLC.
Disclosure
K.N. Chi: Research grant/Funding (self): Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma, Amgen, Bayer, Novartis, Sanofi, Exelixis, Tokai Pharmaceuticals, Oncogenex, Teva; Advisory/Consultancy: ESSA, Astellas Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Lilly/ImClone, Amgen, Bayer, Takeda Pharmaceuticals; Honoraria (self): Sanofi, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharma. S. Thomas: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Janssen Research & Development. M. Gormley: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Janssen Research & Development. D. Shen: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Janssen Research & Development. S. Joshi: Full/Part-time employment: Janssen Research & Development. N. Tran: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Janssen Research & Development. M. Smith: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Janssen Research & Development. D. Ricci: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Janssen Research & Development. K. Fizazi: Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Amgen; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Astellas; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Bayer; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Clovis; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Curevac; Advisory / Consultancy, Received personal fees: Essa; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Genentech; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Janssen; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Merck Sharp and Dohme; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Orion; Advisory/Consultancy, Received personal fees: Sanofi.
Resources from the same session
2108 - Biomarker analyses of ramucirumab in patients with platinum refractory urothelial cancer from RANGE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3090 - Comparison of Immuno-Oncology (IO) Biomarkers in Adenocarcinoma (ACB), Urothelial Carcinoma (UCB) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCCB) of the Bladder, with interim results from PURE01
Presenter: Daniele Raggi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5211 - Potential role of a clinical, taxonomical classification and RNA expression integrated signature to predict response to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients
Presenter: Albert Font
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3206 - Hyperphosphatemia due to Erdafitinib (a Pan-FGFR Inhibitor) and Anti-tumor Activity Among Patients (Pts) with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Scott Tagawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3110 - Prognostic role of FGFR Mutations and FGFR mRNA expression in metastatic urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD(L1) inhibitors in first and second line setting
Presenter: Florian Roghmann
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3564 - Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean-Michel Lavoie
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2760 - Comparative analysis of tumor mutational burden (TMB) prediction methods and its association with determinants of the tumor immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC)
Presenter: Markus Eckstein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2513 - The Immunoscore in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical significance for pathological response and survival
Presenter: Elise Nassif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2835 - Genomic analysis of urothelial cancer and associations with treatment choice and outcome
Presenter: David Sarid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract