Abstract 5405
Background
Novel therapies are replacing established treatment options for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), which poses a challenge to healthcare budgets. The impact of Treatment Evolution in NSCLC (iTEN) model is a validated discrete event patient simulation designed to estimate the impact of treatment sequencing in aNSCLC. The impact of five novel therapies (osimertinib, alectinib, brigatinib, dabrafenib and trametinib, and pembrolizumab combination therapy) changing aNSCLC management in Canada was modelled.
Methods
Current Canadian treatment practices were established via a modified Delphi process with Canadian clinical experts. The table presents potential treatment sequences for biomarker positive aNSCLC with the novel therapies. Clinical efficacy of treatments was estimated from Kaplan–Meier progression-free and overall survival data, as previously described (Moldaver et al. 2018). Modelled costs (2018 CDN $) included drug acquisition and administration costs and the costs of ongoing monitoring, imaging, physician visits, end-of-life, best supportive care, and adverse event management. A treatment rate of 100% in the first-line and 60% thereafter was modelled.Table:
1582P Biomarker positive aNSCLC therapy
EGFR | ALK | BRAF | PD-L1 ≥ 50% | PD-L1 <50% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1L | Osimertinib* | Alectinib* | Dabrafenib plus trametinib* | Pembrolizumab | Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy* |
2L | PD | Brigatinib* | IO for those PD-L1 ≥ 50% PD for remainder | PD | Docetaxel |
3L | I-O | PD | Switch (PD to I-O and I-O to PD) | Docetaxel | Erlotinib |
4L | Docetaxel/BSC | I-O | Docetaxel | Erlotinib/BSC | BSC |
Therapies with an asterisk (*) are new to Canada BSC, best supportive care; I-O, immuno-oncology agent; PD, platinum doublet chemotherapy
Results
Introduction of these five therapies was estimated to increase the average 1- and 3-year survival of Canadian aNSCLC patients from 69% and 14% to 73% and 21%, respectively. Estimated average lifetime cost per treated patient rose from $159,764 to $269,056. ALK positive patients were estimated to have the largest increase in 3-year survival, from 35% to 64%, and cost of treatment, from $315,333 to $747,859.
Conclusions
New therapies for aNSCLC are likely to increase the survival and average cost of treatment in Canada.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
AstraZeneca Canada.
Disclosure
P.K. Cheema: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca Canada, BI, BMS, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Takeda and Merck,. W.K. Evans: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca Canada, AbbVie, Astellas, BMS, Eisai, Lilly, Janssen, Gilead, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Celgene. R. Burkes: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca Canada. R. Sangha: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer, BI, AZ, Roche/Genentech, Lundbeck, BMS, Merck, AbbVie and Takeda, Lilly, BMS, Novartis. C. Ho: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca Canada, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, BMS, Roche, Lilly, Genzyme, Eisai, Merck and Bayer. P. Wheatley-Price: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Leadership role: Novartis, BMS, Merck, AZ, Takeda, Roche and AbbVie. D. Boehm: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca Canada, Baxter and Genomic Health. J. Venkatesh: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca Canada, Takeda. S. Walisser: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: stellas Pharma Canada, AstraZeneca Canada, Gilead Sciences Canada, Pfizer, and Janssen Inc. D. Grima: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Officer / Board of Directors: Cornerstone Research Group. D. Moldaver: Full / Part-time employment: Cornerstone Research Group. M. Hurry: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca Canada.
Resources from the same session
2935 - Correlation of progression free survival-2 and overall survival in solid tumors
Presenter: Paul Mainwaring
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2273 - High performance of serial tumor biopsies in first in human (FIH) phase I trials.
Presenter: Jun Sato
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5933 - Response rates and lesion-level progression patterns of solid tumor patients in an academic phase 1 program: implications for tumor heterogeneity
Presenter: Christopher Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3569 - Clinical Benefit and Response Rate in Early Phase Clinical Trials: First Report from a Single-Institution Study
Presenter: Antonio Marra
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4139 - Patient (pt) selection for immunotherapeutic early-phase clinical trials (ieCTs): a single Phase I Unit experience
Presenter: Matteo Simonelli
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4451 - Improving patient selection for immuno-oncology phase 1 trials: an external validation of five prognostic scores at Claudius Regaud Institute of Toulouse, Oncopôle (IUCT-O).
Presenter: Ghassan Al Darazi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1696 - Demonstrating the Changing Trends in Phase 1 Clinical Trials
Presenter: Christina Guo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3202 - Participation of Women in phase 1 oncology clinical trials
Presenter: Laura Vidal
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4518 - Predictors for early trial discontinuation of patients with cancer participating in phase I clinical trials
Presenter: Joeri Douma
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4368 - Safety of Tumor Treating Fields delivery to the torso: Meta analysis from TTFields clinical trials
Presenter: Federica Grosso
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract