Abstract 3345
Background
Patients with advanced end stage cancer have < 1% chance of spontaneous circulation following cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Effective communication in a timely manner is best practice to ensure DNACPR (Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation) decisions are implemented correctly, well understood by patients/relatives and to avoid unnecessary CPR. Previous audit data at LRI and clinician experience indicated that oncology inpatients were having significant delays in DNACPR discussions. In many cases DNACPR decisions were occurring in emergency clinical situations by out of hours on-call medical staff.
Methods
We identified unwell (early warning score >5) oncology inpatients admitted to LRI. Using a data collection tool, we primarily identified the proportion of patients who had a DNACPR decision. Furthermore, we analysed timeliness of DNACPR decisions, involvement of patients’ own oncology team and documentation of prognosis/escalation plans. Liaising with healthcare professionals from oncology & palliative care we formulated ideas to improve outcomes. Enhancing communication between permanent ward staff (nurses & junior doctors) and senior decision makers (oncology registrars & consultants) was vital to improve outcomes. We therefore empowered junior doctors/nursing staff to identify patients who needed DNACPR discussions using a proforma tool utilising board round meetings as a platform. Data was then analysed to compare outcomes.
Results
Qualitative data showed improved confidence for junior doctors in identifying & communicating DNACPR discussions.Table:
1598P
Before Intervention | After Intervention | |
---|---|---|
DNACPR discussed by own team | 11% | 54% |
DNACPR discussed by oncology team | 29% | 92% |
DNACPR discussed in daytime | 24% | 77% |
Mean time to implement DNACPR | 4 days | 2.5 days |
DNACPR implemented and patient discharged home | 5% | 54% |
DNACPR not implemented in eligible patient – died following CPR | 44% | 12% |
Documentation of escalation plan | 30% | 85% |
Documentation of prognosis | 25% | 54% |
Conclusions
Empowering junior doctors and simple departmental changes lead to a significant improvement in communicating and implementing DNACPR decisions. We therefore significantly reduced unnecessary CPR attempts and subsequently improved communication and documentation of escalation plans and prognosis. We believe our model can be implemented in other oncology centres and look forward to discussing this further.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
National Health Service, UK.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4811 - Comprehensive genomic profiling of thymic carcinoma in a sample Chinese population
Presenter: Baohui Han
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2045 - The analysis of treatment sequences and clinical outcomes of thymic carcinoma
Presenter: Arakaki Motoko
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4785 - Transcriptomic Difference of Thymoma and Thymic Carcinoma
Presenter: Naixin Liang
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2864 - A Phase II Trial of Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Pembrolizumab for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Seoyoung Lee
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5015 - The study of tumor associated exosomes in crosstalk between esophageal carcinoma and lymphatic endothelial cells
Presenter: Weimin Mao
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1339 - Up-regulation of IBSP expression predicts poor prognosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma patients
Presenter: Mingyue Wang
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4083 - PD-L1 expression in primary tumour vs metastatic samples in the Phase 3 MYSTIC study in first-line metastatic (m) NSCLC
Presenter: Niels Reinmuth
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5113 - Assessing the impact of subsequent checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) treatment on overall survival: post hoc analyses from the phase 3 JAVELIN Lung 200 study of avelumab vs docetaxel in platinum-treated locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Fabrice Barlesi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4256 - Long-term avelumab treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): post hoc analyses from JAVELIN Solid Tumor
Presenter: Borys Hrinczenko
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4305 - Effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in the treatment of lung cancer patients in France: Updated survival and subgroup analysis from the real-world EVIDENS study
Presenter: Fabrice Barlesi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract