Abstract 4377
Background
The ALTERNATIVE trial randomized 355 patients (pts) with HER2+/HR+ metastatic BC to receive as 1st-line therapy lapatinib (L) + trastuzumab (T) + aromatase inhibitors (AI) or T + AI or L + AI. The neoadjuvant PAMELA trial tested a chemo-free regimen of L + T on HER2+ pts, combined with letrozole or tamoxifen in HR+ tumors. We explored the hypothesis that gene expression may help predicting benefit from anti-HER2 therapy in combination with ET.
Methods
The expression of 55 BC-related genes was evaluated from FFPE tumors using the nCounter. The PAM50 subtype distribution and the association of the expression of each gene (continuous variable) with progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated using univariate Cox-models. Median PFS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Clinical benefit (CB) was defined as complete or partial response or stable disease at 6 months. The Cutoff Finder tool was used to find an optimal gene expression cut-off with CB as the endpoint. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of gene expression with pathologic complete resonse (pCR) and CB.
Results
In ALTERNATIVE, 60 tumors (16.9%) were analyzed: 57% HER2-enriched, 20% Luminal B, 12% Luminal A, 8% Normal-like and 3% Basal-like. Median PFS in ERBB2-high group (above the median) was higher compared to ERBB2-low group (11.0 vs 5.6 months; Hazard Ratio [HazR]=0.49; p = 0.006). ERBB2 was found more expressed in pts with CB. CB rate was higher in the ERBB2-high group compared to ERBB2-low group (54% vs 22%; p = 0.013). An optimal ERBB2 mRNA cutoff (2.923) for predicting CB (AUC=0.68; odds ratio [OR]=1.49, p = 0.014; PFS HazR=0.46, p = 0.022) was then identified. The same ERBB2 cutoff in PAMELA baseline tumor samples (n = 77) was found significantly associated with pCR (43.8% in ERBB2-high vs. 11.5% in ERBB2-low; adjusted OR = 4.45; p = 0.041).
Conclusions
ERBB2 mRNA expression is a robust predictor of response and survival outcome in HER2+/HR+ BC following HER2-blockade and ET. Our study identifies a common biomarker between pCR improvement (OR ∼4.5) in early disease and CB in the advanced setting (PFS HazR of ∼0.50).
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Institut d’investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
N. Chic: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eisai. F. Schettini: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Celgene; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer. M. Vidal: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eisai; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Daiichi Sankyo. M. Muñoz: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. J. Cortés: Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche/Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Biothera Pharmaceutical; Advisory / Consultancy: Merus; Advisory / Consultancy: Seattle Genetics. A. Llombart-Cussac: Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche/Genentech. M. Rimawi: Advisory / Consultancy: GlaxoSmithKline; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche/Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy: MacroGenics; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Daiichi Sankyo. A. Prat: Advisory / Consultancy: Nanostring Techonologies. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4543 - Long-term real-world (RW) outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma (MEL) treated with ipilimumab (IPI) and non-IPI therapies: IMAGE study
Presenter: Stéphane Dalle
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4523 - Prognostic Factors for efficacy of Ipilimumab used after AntiPD1 and/or BRAF+MEK inhibitors in Melanoma Patients: an Italian Melanoma Intergroup study
Presenter: Riccardo Marconcini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3632 - Rechallenge with combination ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 (IPI+PD1) in metastatic melanoma after acquired resistance to IPI+PD1 immunotherapy
Presenter: Adriana Hepner
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3732 - Clinicopathologic characteristics of immune colitis in melanoma patients treated with combination ipilimumab and anti-PD1 (IPI+PD1) and PD1 monotherapy.
Presenter: Kazi Nahar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5005 - Real-world outcomes of ipilimumab plus nivolumab for advanced melanoma in the Netherlands
Presenter: Michiel van Zeijl
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5524 - Utilization of Real-World Data to Assess the Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Presenter: D Scott Ernst
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5884 - Tumor mutational burden and response to PD-1 inhibitors: an analysis of 89 cases of metastatic melanoma.
Presenter: Léa Dousset
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3120 - Increase in S100B and LDH as early outcome predictors for non-responsiveness to anti-PD-1 monotherapy in advanced melanoma.
Presenter: Elisa Rozeman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2157 - Immune status defined by molecular information layers predicts response to pembrolizumab treatment in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Guillermo Prado-Vázquez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2553 - Interim analysis of a phase Ib study of cobimetinib plus atezolizumab in patients with advanced BRAFV600 wild type melanoma progressing on prior anti-PD-L1 therapy
Presenter: Shahneen Sandhu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract