Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

EONS 12: Recent trends in palliative care

5966 - EONS - Opinions of palliative care patients and nurses regarding dignified care

Date

28 Sep 2019

Session

EONS 12: Recent trends in palliative care

Topics

End-of-Life Care

Tumour Site

Presenters

Yasemin Eskigulek

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v822-v824. 10.1093/annonc/mdz273

Authors

Y. Eskigulek1, S. Kav2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Gynecologic Oncology, Gazi University - Faculty of Medicine, 06560 - Ankara/TR
  • 2 Faculty Of Health Sciences Nursing Department, Baskent University, 06790 - Ankara/TR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 5966

Background

Dignity is an important issue for delivering high quality palliative care. This descriptive, methodological study was conducted to evaluate Turkish validity and reliability of The Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) among palliative care patients and to explore the views of palliative care patients and nurses about dignified care.

Methods

This study was approved by Baskent University Institutional Review Board (Project No: KA17/280). Patient demographic form, Palliative Performance Scale and, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were used for data collection.Ten palliative care patients and 10 nurses were interviewed. The semi-structured, face to face interviews were recorded digitally, transcribed verbatim and analyzed. Turkish validity and reliability study of the PDI was conducted with 127 palliative care patients with advanced cancer. Face validity, factor structure, concurrent validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability analysis were performed.

Results

Cronbach’s coefficient alpha for the PDI was 0.94 and test-retest reliability was r = 0.75. Concurrent validity tests demonstrated positive significant correlations between factors of PDI and HADS. Factor analysis demonstrated 5 factors accounting for 68.7% of the overall variance. The factors were labeled as symptom distress, existential distress, self-confidence, dependency and, support and care requirements. Three themes emerged through data obtained from palliative care patients: respectability, caring practices, and usefulness. Three themes emerged through data obtained from palliative care nurses: maintaining one’s respectability; barriers and recommendations; benefits of care.

Conclusions

Turkish version of the PDI is a valid and reliable instrument among palliative care patients. Education may be useful for raising awareness of healthcare professionals about dignified care.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.