Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session 1

4845 - Embedded outpatient palliative care service within the oncology clinic: Preliminary experience in Hacettepe Oncology Hospital

Date

28 Sep 2019

Session

Poster Display session 1

Topics

End-of-Life Care

Tumour Site

Presenters

Deniz Can Guven

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v661-v666. 10.1093/annonc/mdz261

Authors

D.C. Guven, O.H. Aktepe, Z. Berk, G. Guner, H. Taban, B.Y. Aktas, Z.C. Duran, S. Akin, Z. Arik, N. Kertmen, S. Kilickap, A. Turker, O. Dizdar

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, 6100 - Ankara/TR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 4845

Background

Outpatient palliative care (OPC) offers improved symptom control, quality of life and even survival. OPC clinics may be embedded in the oncology clinic or independent. We herein present our experience with an embedded OPC clinic led by a medical oncologist, an internist and a nurse in Hacettepe University Medical Oncology Clinic.

Methods

Patients who were referred by their oncologist or those who had severe symptoms and applied without referral were admitted. Besides baseline history and physical exam, Edmonton Symptom Assesment Scale (ESAS), Nutritional risk screening 2002 and visual analog scale for pain were routinely assessed except for patients with acute symptoms requiring urgent intervention. Interventions and consultations were recorded for all patients.

Results

A total of 174 patients were seen in our clinic within the first 5 months. Demographic features are shown in the table. The chief complaints were pain (26%), nausea and vomiting (13%) and decreased feeding (9%). Besides their chief complaints, patients had a median of 4 (min 0- max 8) other severe (ESAS score of > 5) complaints. The most frequent interventions were intravenous hydration, analgesic and/or antiemetic administration and prescription (n = 66), nutritionist (n = 62) and pain specialist (n = 59) consultations. Thirty-three patients (19 %) were referred for immediate hospitalization. The overall mortality within the first 30 days after the first OPC visit was 17%.Table:

1615P Baseline characteristics of the applied patients

Median Age (minimum- maximum)60.5 (17-91)
Male/Female94 (58%)/80 (42%)
Patient StagesStage 1: 4 (2.3%) Stage 2: 7 (4%) Stage 3: 18 (10.3%) Stage 4: 157 (73.6%)
ECOG Performance StatusECOG 0: 19 (10.9%) ECOG 1: 50 (28.7%) ECOG 2: 36 (20.7%) ECOG 3: 40 (23%) ECOG 4: 25 (14.4%)
Tumor SitesGastrointestinal: 53 (30.5%) Lung: 43 (24.7%) Genitourinary: 15 (8.6%) Breast: 14 (8%) Gynecologic: 11 (6.3%) Head and Neck Cancer: 9 (5.2%) Other: 29 (16.7%)

Conclusions

Our initial experience with the embedded OPC clinic mostly included patients with advanced disease, multiple severe symptoms and high risk of mortality. Management of these patients within the oncology clinic may address palliative care needs of these patients, provide timely therapeutic interventions, reduce unnecessary diagnostic tests and diminish emergency department applications by these patients.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.