Abstract 2624
Background
As we all know, patients with sensitive genes mutation could achieve better overall survival by taking targeted drugs. Many trials showed that non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EFGR) mutation responded to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors worse than EGFR wild-type. And subgroups of trials also reported the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of NSCLC patients with other sensitive genes mutation. So we conducted a complementary systematic review and meta-analysis to compare efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for NSCLC patients with sensitive genes mutation.
Methods
PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central) databases were searched for all clinical trials in NSCLC until 5th of January 2019. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy in NSCLC patients with sensitive genes mutation. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) were used.
Results
A total of 2419 patients from 4 RCTs (2 with PD-1 inhibitors; 2 with PD-L1 inhibitors) were included. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly prolonged the OS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60–0.67) and PFS (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36–0.60) in NSCLC patients with EGFR wild-type versus chemotherapy. Meanwhile, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors prolonged the OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39–0.94) in NSCLC patients with KRAS mutation versus chemotherapy. However, for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation (the OS of HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.80–1.55; the PFS of HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.35–1.64) and KRAS wild-type (the OS of HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.68–1.17), there were no significant differences between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy.
Conclusions
PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are more efficacious in NSCLC patients with EGFR wild-type and KRAS mutation compared with chemotherapy. There was no significant difference between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation and KRAS wild-type.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81873396).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4614 - Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Naïve and Ipilimumab-Refractory Melanoma
Presenter: Domenico Mallardo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2901 - IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio as predictive biomarker for response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients
Presenter: Emilio Giunta
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2306 - Multiplex Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Spatial Analysis of Checkpoint-Positive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs)
Presenter: Scott Ely
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1678 - The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Presenter: Alberto Carretero-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5138 - Radiomic Features as a Non-invasive Biomarker to Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Presenter: Kye Jin Park
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5800 - Integrative combination of high-plex digital profiling techniques and cluster analysis to reveal complex immune biology in the tumor microenvironment of mesothelioma
Presenter: Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5736 - Predictive factors of response to immunotherapy in 198 patients with metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer (mNSCLC): real world data from 2 university hospitals in Spain
Presenter: Juan Felipe Cordoba Ortega
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5645 - Evaluating Lung CT Density Changes Among Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Treated with Thoracic Radiotherapy (TRT) alone or TRT Followed by Combined Ipilimumab (IPI) and Nivolumab (NIVO).
Presenter: Kujtim Latifi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1540 - Immuno-oncology therapy biomarkers differences between polyoma-virus positive and negative Merkel cell carcinomas
Presenter: Zoran Gatalica
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4538 - Can we improve patient selection for phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1) based on Immuno-Oncology score prognostic index (VIO)?
Presenter: Ignacio Matos Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract