Abstract 2551
Background
DD adjuvant CT improves disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in high-risk, hormone receptor positive BC. Luminal A and luminal B subtypes have different sensitivity to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy; however, their role in predicting DD efficacy in clinically high-risk setting is uncertain. This exploratory analysis of the GIM2 trial (Del Mastro et al, Lancet 2015) evaluated DD efficacy according to IHC defined luminal subtypes.
Methods
In the GIM2 trial, pts with node-positive early BC were randomized to receive 4 cycles of (fluorouracil) epirubicin/cyclophosphamide every 2 (DD) or every 3 (standard interval [SI]) weeks followed by 4 cycles of DD or SI paclitaxel. Luminal A-like and luminal B-like BC were identified according to 13h St Gallen definition as having a Ki67<20% and a PgR>/=20% (luminal A-like), and a Ki67>/=20% and/or a PgR<20% (luminal B-like). Pts with HER2-positive BC were excluded. The efficacy of DD CT in terms of DFS and OS was compared between the two subtypes.
Results
Of 2,003 pts enrolled in the GIM2 trial, 401 had luminal A-like and 657 luminal B-like BC. After a median follow-up of 8 years, DFS was 81.1% (95% Confidence Intervals [CI] 76.6-84.7) and 70.6% (66.6-74.1) in luminal A-like and B-like BC, respectively; OS was 91.6% (88.1-94.1) and 85% (81.7-87.7), respectively. There was no significant interaction between treatment and luminal subtypes (pinteraction=0.416 for DFS and pinteraction=0.313 for OS); however, the effect of DD CT appeared to be greater in luminal-B like BC (see table below).Table:
186P
8 year DFS SI | 8 year DFS DD | HR (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|
luminal A-like | 81.6 | 80.6 | 0.86 (0.56-1.30) |
luminal B-like | 66.8 | 74.7 | 0.74 (0.55-0.98) |
8 year OS SI | 8 year OS DD | ||
Luminal A-like | 92.9 | 90.6 | 0.88 (0.47-1.67) |
luminal B-like | 80.8 | 89.4 | 0.61 (0.40-0.93) |
Conclusions
These long-term results confirm the prognostic value of IHC-defined luminal subtypes, with luminal B-like bearing a worse prognosis. In clinically high-risk, hormone receptor positive BC, luminal B-like subtype benefits more from DD CT both in terms of DFS and OS.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Lambertini: Honoraria (self), speaker honoraria: Theramex; Advisory / Consultancy: Teva. M. De Laurentiis: Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene. S. De Placido: Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Celgene; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly. F. Montemurro: Honoraria (self), speaker honoraria: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), speaker honoraria: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), speaker honoraria: Novartis; Honoraria (self), speaker honoraria: Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, speaker honoraria, travel grant: Roche. L. Del Mastro: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Honoraria (self): Roche-Genentech; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4874 - Complete Responses in Patients With 2nd-Line or Greater Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Following First-in-Human Immunotherapy Combining NK and T Cell Activation with Off-the-Shelf High-Affinity CD16 NK Cell Line (haNK)
Presenter: Chaitali Nangia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4362 - Reproducibility and concordance of 4 clinically developed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)
Presenter: Aurelia Noske
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4528 - Systemic Therapy in 2nd-Line Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC): A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and Meta-Analysis (MA) of Efficacy
Presenter: Peter Kaufman
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4112 - Cisplatin given at three divided doses for three consecutive days in metastatic breast cancer: an alternative schedule for one full dose with comparable efficacy but less CINV and hypomagnesaemia
Presenter: Yang Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5699 - Patterns and predictors of first-line (1L) taxane use in US patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)
Presenter: Joyce O’Shaughnessy
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1931 - Maintenance Chemotherapy is effective in Patients with Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer After First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy
Presenter: Jian Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4696 - Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to investigate symptom burden enrichment in Stage IV patients at an academic center
Presenter: Madeline Matthys
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4582 - Measures of functional status in adults aged ≥70 years with advanced breast cancer (ABC) receiving palbociclib (PAL) combination therapy in POLARIS
Presenter: Meghan Karuturi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3565 - Real-World 1-Year Survival Analysis of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer with Liver or Lung Metastasis Treated with Eribulin, Gemcitabine or Capecitabine
Presenter: Shayma Kazmi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3608 - Prognostic impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Khalil SALEH
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract