Abstract 3821
Background
Mature oocyte vitrification and storage is currently used to help patients preserving their ability to have offspring either for fertility preservation (FP) before gonadotoxic treatment such as chemotherapy or for elective purposes. Our meta-analysis investigated whether letrozole co-administration during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for FP is effective and safe.
Methods
A literature search using PubMed was conducted up to March 8th, 2019 to retrieve information from studies that compared the performance of COS with or without letrozole co-administration for FP. Mean or median values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or standard deviations (SDs) were collected for efficacy (number of collected oocytes, number of mature oocytes, maturation rate) and safety (peak estradiol levels [E2], total gonadotropin dose, number of stimulation days) endpoints. Statistical analysis was conducted with random-effects model.
Results
A total of 10 articles were eligible including 1930 patients undergoing COS with or without letrozole. Studies compared COS with and without letrozole in cancer or infertile cohorts (N = 9) and infertile cohort only (N = 1). The total number of oocytes and mature oocytes collected were similar between letrozole and no letrozole groups while the peak estradiol was significantly higher in the standard COS without letrozole (Table).Table:
1829P
MR (letrozole vs no letrozole) | 95% CI | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|
Collected oocytes | 1.02 | 0.90-1.16 | 0.748 |
Mature oocytes | 0.98 | 0.83-1.16 | 0.830 |
Maturation rate | 0.94 | 0.86-1.03 | 0.181 |
Peak E2 | 0.27 | 0.22-0.32 | <0.001 |
Total gonadotropin | 0.97 | 0.86-1.10 | 0.676 |
Length of stimulation | 1.00 | 0.95-1.04 | 0.849 |
Conclusions
Letrozole co-administration during COS resulted to be as effective as standard COS but with significantly decreased peak estradiol levels, suggesting its increased safety especially for hormone-sensitive cancer patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5011 - LCSCAF1 maintains cancer stem-like traits by stabilizing c-Myc protein and promotes metastasis and recurrence in lung cancer
Presenter: Tao Guo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4955 - XAF1 Enhances Temozolomide Induced Autophagic Cell Death through AMPK signaling pathway
Presenter: Mingoo Lee
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5616 - The effect of cortisol on methylation patterns in breast cancer cell lines
Presenter: Haya Intabli
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4649 - Global and sex-specific epigenome-wide association studies for the identification of the main methylated loci related to smoking in a Mediterranean population
Presenter: Judith Begona Ramirez Sabio
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4984 - Whole transcriptomics analyses of mimicking Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq)
Presenter: Jessica Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5926 - Comparison of enzymatic- and bisulfite conversion to map the plasma cell-free methylome in cancer
Presenter: Nicole Lambert
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5454 - Detection of low mutations in hepatocellular carcinoma by using circulating tumor DNA
Presenter: Esl Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4428 - Variants in the JAK1 and JAK2 genes in the risk and prognosis of patients with cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Bruna Carvalho
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4409 - P-Rex1 expression in breast cancer patients.
Presenter: Angela Lara Montero
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4185 - Modulation of Risk of Cutaneous Melanoma Patients by Variants in STAT3 Gene and Functional Analysis
Presenter: Gabriela Gomez
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract