Abstract 3821
Background
Mature oocyte vitrification and storage is currently used to help patients preserving their ability to have offspring either for fertility preservation (FP) before gonadotoxic treatment such as chemotherapy or for elective purposes. Our meta-analysis investigated whether letrozole co-administration during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for FP is effective and safe.
Methods
A literature search using PubMed was conducted up to March 8th, 2019 to retrieve information from studies that compared the performance of COS with or without letrozole co-administration for FP. Mean or median values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or standard deviations (SDs) were collected for efficacy (number of collected oocytes, number of mature oocytes, maturation rate) and safety (peak estradiol levels [E2], total gonadotropin dose, number of stimulation days) endpoints. Statistical analysis was conducted with random-effects model.
Results
A total of 10 articles were eligible including 1930 patients undergoing COS with or without letrozole. Studies compared COS with and without letrozole in cancer or infertile cohorts (N = 9) and infertile cohort only (N = 1). The total number of oocytes and mature oocytes collected were similar between letrozole and no letrozole groups while the peak estradiol was significantly higher in the standard COS without letrozole (Table).Table:
1829P
| MR (letrozole vs no letrozole) | 95% CI | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collected oocytes | 1.02 | 0.90-1.16 | 0.748 |
| Mature oocytes | 0.98 | 0.83-1.16 | 0.830 |
| Maturation rate | 0.94 | 0.86-1.03 | 0.181 |
| Peak E2 | 0.27 | 0.22-0.32 | <0.001 |
| Total gonadotropin | 0.97 | 0.86-1.10 | 0.676 |
| Length of stimulation | 1.00 | 0.95-1.04 | 0.849 |
Conclusions
Letrozole co-administration during COS resulted to be as effective as standard COS but with significantly decreased peak estradiol levels, suggesting its increased safety especially for hormone-sensitive cancer patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5037 - CXCR4, CCR2 and CCR5 expression in subsets of tumor cells with stem and/or EMT features
Presenter: Olga Savelieva
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5729 - Expression of mutant p53 affects cancer cell sensitivity to topotecan
Presenter: Rimma Mingaleeva
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5725 - Breast cancer organoids a new tool for the prediction of drugs penetration and patient’outcome
Presenter: Giuseppina Roscigno
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5680 - Aptamer-mediated exosomes detection for early breast cancer identification.
Presenter: Cristina Quintavalle
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2460 - MicroRNA-181c promotes tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells via upregulation Akt/mTOR axis
Presenter: Alexander Scherbakov
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3751 - Spatio-temporal separation of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T-cells and HER2/neu+ tumor cells in tumor-immune milieu of infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast
Presenter: Sandhya Sreedharan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4664 - Large genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in the Portuguese population.
Presenter: Joao Pinto
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4611 - Non-BRCA1/2 hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: findings from a multidisciplinary program
Presenter: Ana Monteiro
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5340 - Quantitative imaging and characterization of collagen patterns in high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC)
Presenter: Ruby Huang
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4209 - Semiquantitative assessment of vimentin expression in prostate cancer (PC)
Presenter: Marina Puchinskaya
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract