Abstract 4463
Background
Irinotecan is widely used, but also known for its severe toxicities neutropenia and diarrhea. Based on preclinical data, combined caloric and protein restriction (CCPR) might improve treatment tolerability without impairing antitumor effect. Therefore, we studied the influence of CCPR on irinotecan pharmacokinetics and toxicity.
Methods
In this cross-over trial, patients with liver metastases of solid tumors were included and randomized to treatment with irinotecan preceded by 5 days of CCPR (∼30% caloric and ∼70% protein restriction) during the 1st cycle and a 2nd cycle preceded by a normal diet (ND) or vice versa. During both cycles, 24-hours blood sampling was performed and 24-26 hours after infusion biopsies of both healthy liver (HL) and liver metastasis (LM) were taken. Primary endpoint was the relative difference in geometric means for the active metabolite SN-38 concentration in HL, as analyzed by a linear mixed model. Secondary endpoints included irinotecan and SN-38 concentrations in LM, plasma area under the curve (AUC0-24h), and toxicity.
Results
Interpatient variability (n = 19) in tissue irinotecan and SN-38 concentrations was high, showing no significant differences in irinotecan (+16.8%, 95% CI: -9.7-51.1%, P = 0.227) and SN-38 (+9.8%, 95% CI: -16.4-44.2%, P = 0.48) concentrations between CCPR and ND in HL, as well as in LM (irinotecan: -38.8%, 90% CI: -59.3:-7.9%, P = 0.05 and SN-38: -13.8%, 90% CI:-40.7-25.4%, P = 0.50). CCPR increased irinotecan plasma AUC0-24h with 7.1% (95% CI: 0.3-14.5%, P = 0.04) compared to ND, while the SN-38 plasma AUC0-24h increased with 50.3% (95% CI: 34.6-67.9%, P < 0.001). CCPR was well tolerated with low incidence of grade ≥3 therapy related toxicity. Grade ≥3 toxicity was not increased during CCPR vs ND (P = 0.69). No difference was seen in neutropenia grade ≥3 (47% vs 32% P = 0.38), diarrhea grade ≥3 (5% vs 21% P = 0.25), febrile neutropenia (5% vs 16% P = 0.50) and hospitalization (11% vs 21% P = 0.634) during CCPR vs ND.
Conclusions
CCPR resulted in a dramatically increased plasma SN-38 exposure, while toxicity did not change. CCPR did not result in altered irinotecan and SN-38 exposure in HL and LM. CCPR might therefore potentially improve the therapeutic window in patients treated with irinotecan.
Clinical trial identification
Netherlands Trial Register NL5624 (NTR5731) release date: 2016-03-04.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
A.H.J. Mathijssen.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
S.L. Koolen: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen. R.H.J. Mathijssen: Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pamgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Honoraria (institution): Servier; Honoraria (institution): Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1707 - Clinical utility of precision immunoprofiling and monitoring of the tumor microenvironment using flow cytometry and CyTOF in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with atezolizumab: results from a phase II study for biomarker analysis (EPOC1702)
Presenter: Keisuke Kirita
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3594 - Tumor mutation burden (TMB), PD-L1, IFN-γ signaling identify subgroups of patients (pts) who benefit from durvalumab (D, anti-PDL1) or D and tremelimumab (T, anti-CTLA4) treatment in urothelial bladder cancer (UC)
Presenter: Christophe Massard
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
744 - The decrease of TMB, TNB and HLA expression are the Mechanism of Drug Resistance of NSCLC to immunosuppressive PD-1/PD-l1.
Presenter: Sheng Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2350 - Eosinophilia during treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) predicts succeeding onset of immune-related adverse events (irAEs)
Presenter: Rika Kizawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5930 - A transcriptomic immunologic signature predicts favorable outcome in neoadjuvant chemotherapy treated triple negative breast tumors.
Presenter: Javier Pérez-peña
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6127 - Alterations of TMB and TCR repertoires during Chemotherapy in East Asian lung cancer patients without TKI-related driver gene mutations
Presenter: Lele Song
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1310 - Association of SCFA in gut microbiome and clinical response in solid cancer patients treated with andi-PD-1 antibody.
Presenter: Motoo Nomura
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2286 - Extracellular matrix and tissue derived metabolites in a liquid biopsy identifies endotypes of metastatic melanoma patients with differential response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment
Presenter: Nicholas Willumsen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4107 - Pathologic scoring of pre-treatment H&E biopsies predicts overall survival in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab monotherapy
Presenter: Julie Stein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1291 - PD-L1 expression in uncommon EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer and its response to immunotherapy
Presenter: Yun Fan
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract