Abstract 4463
Background
Irinotecan is widely used, but also known for its severe toxicities neutropenia and diarrhea. Based on preclinical data, combined caloric and protein restriction (CCPR) might improve treatment tolerability without impairing antitumor effect. Therefore, we studied the influence of CCPR on irinotecan pharmacokinetics and toxicity.
Methods
In this cross-over trial, patients with liver metastases of solid tumors were included and randomized to treatment with irinotecan preceded by 5 days of CCPR (∼30% caloric and ∼70% protein restriction) during the 1st cycle and a 2nd cycle preceded by a normal diet (ND) or vice versa. During both cycles, 24-hours blood sampling was performed and 24-26 hours after infusion biopsies of both healthy liver (HL) and liver metastasis (LM) were taken. Primary endpoint was the relative difference in geometric means for the active metabolite SN-38 concentration in HL, as analyzed by a linear mixed model. Secondary endpoints included irinotecan and SN-38 concentrations in LM, plasma area under the curve (AUC0-24h), and toxicity.
Results
Interpatient variability (n = 19) in tissue irinotecan and SN-38 concentrations was high, showing no significant differences in irinotecan (+16.8%, 95% CI: -9.7-51.1%, P = 0.227) and SN-38 (+9.8%, 95% CI: -16.4-44.2%, P = 0.48) concentrations between CCPR and ND in HL, as well as in LM (irinotecan: -38.8%, 90% CI: -59.3:-7.9%, P = 0.05 and SN-38: -13.8%, 90% CI:-40.7-25.4%, P = 0.50). CCPR increased irinotecan plasma AUC0-24h with 7.1% (95% CI: 0.3-14.5%, P = 0.04) compared to ND, while the SN-38 plasma AUC0-24h increased with 50.3% (95% CI: 34.6-67.9%, P < 0.001). CCPR was well tolerated with low incidence of grade ≥3 therapy related toxicity. Grade ≥3 toxicity was not increased during CCPR vs ND (P = 0.69). No difference was seen in neutropenia grade ≥3 (47% vs 32% P = 0.38), diarrhea grade ≥3 (5% vs 21% P = 0.25), febrile neutropenia (5% vs 16% P = 0.50) and hospitalization (11% vs 21% P = 0.634) during CCPR vs ND.
Conclusions
CCPR resulted in a dramatically increased plasma SN-38 exposure, while toxicity did not change. CCPR did not result in altered irinotecan and SN-38 exposure in HL and LM. CCPR might therefore potentially improve the therapeutic window in patients treated with irinotecan.
Clinical trial identification
Netherlands Trial Register NL5624 (NTR5731) release date: 2016-03-04.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
A.H.J. Mathijssen.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
S.L. Koolen: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen. R.H.J. Mathijssen: Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pamgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Honoraria (institution): Servier; Honoraria (institution): Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1945 - Randomized Phase II Study of Trabectedin/Olaparib Compared to Physician’s Choice in Subjects with Previously Treated Advanced or Recurrent Solid Tumors Harboring DNA Repair Deficiencies.
Presenter: Christoph Heilig
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3021 - Homogenisation of Leftover Surgical Tissue across multiple cancer types: a Feasibility Study (HoLST-F)
Presenter: Lavinia Spain
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2882 - Safety, efficacy, and immune effects of intratumoral tilsotolimod in patients with refractory solid tumors: updated results from ILLUMINATE-101
Presenter: Hani Babiker
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1950 - Phase 1 Dose Escalation of MSC-1, a humanized anti-LIF monoclonal antibody, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: Updated results
Presenter: Erkut Borazanci
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2391 - A phase 1 study of Sym021, an anti-PD-1 antibody (Ab), alone and in combination with Sym022 (anti-LAG-3) or Sym023 (anti-TIM-3)
Presenter: Anna Spreafico
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5692 - FPA150 (B7-H4 antibody) Phase 1 Update in Advanced Solid Tumors: Monotherapy and in Combination with Pembrolizumab
Presenter: Zev Wainberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2416 - MG1124, a novel CEACAM1-targeted monoclonal antibody, has therapeutic potential as a combination partner of PD-1 inhibitors in NSCLC patients
Presenter: Eun Hee Lee
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2661 - Tumor stroma targeting and modulation by OMTX705 ADC, a novel and potent immunotherapeutic treatment of solid tumors.
Presenter: Myriam Fabre
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3681 - Durvalumab + monalizumab, mFOLFOX6, and bevacizumab in patients (pts) with metastatic microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer (MSS-CRC)
Presenter: May Cho
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2664 - Phase (Ph) II study of MBG453 + spartalizumab in patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma pretreated with anti–PD-1/L1 therapy
Presenter: Nicholas Mach
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract