Abstract 4463
Background
Irinotecan is widely used, but also known for its severe toxicities neutropenia and diarrhea. Based on preclinical data, combined caloric and protein restriction (CCPR) might improve treatment tolerability without impairing antitumor effect. Therefore, we studied the influence of CCPR on irinotecan pharmacokinetics and toxicity.
Methods
In this cross-over trial, patients with liver metastases of solid tumors were included and randomized to treatment with irinotecan preceded by 5 days of CCPR (∼30% caloric and ∼70% protein restriction) during the 1st cycle and a 2nd cycle preceded by a normal diet (ND) or vice versa. During both cycles, 24-hours blood sampling was performed and 24-26 hours after infusion biopsies of both healthy liver (HL) and liver metastasis (LM) were taken. Primary endpoint was the relative difference in geometric means for the active metabolite SN-38 concentration in HL, as analyzed by a linear mixed model. Secondary endpoints included irinotecan and SN-38 concentrations in LM, plasma area under the curve (AUC0-24h), and toxicity.
Results
Interpatient variability (n = 19) in tissue irinotecan and SN-38 concentrations was high, showing no significant differences in irinotecan (+16.8%, 95% CI: -9.7-51.1%, P = 0.227) and SN-38 (+9.8%, 95% CI: -16.4-44.2%, P = 0.48) concentrations between CCPR and ND in HL, as well as in LM (irinotecan: -38.8%, 90% CI: -59.3:-7.9%, P = 0.05 and SN-38: -13.8%, 90% CI:-40.7-25.4%, P = 0.50). CCPR increased irinotecan plasma AUC0-24h with 7.1% (95% CI: 0.3-14.5%, P = 0.04) compared to ND, while the SN-38 plasma AUC0-24h increased with 50.3% (95% CI: 34.6-67.9%, P < 0.001). CCPR was well tolerated with low incidence of grade ≥3 therapy related toxicity. Grade ≥3 toxicity was not increased during CCPR vs ND (P = 0.69). No difference was seen in neutropenia grade ≥3 (47% vs 32% P = 0.38), diarrhea grade ≥3 (5% vs 21% P = 0.25), febrile neutropenia (5% vs 16% P = 0.50) and hospitalization (11% vs 21% P = 0.634) during CCPR vs ND.
Conclusions
CCPR resulted in a dramatically increased plasma SN-38 exposure, while toxicity did not change. CCPR did not result in altered irinotecan and SN-38 exposure in HL and LM. CCPR might therefore potentially improve the therapeutic window in patients treated with irinotecan.
Clinical trial identification
Netherlands Trial Register NL5624 (NTR5731) release date: 2016-03-04.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
A.H.J. Mathijssen.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
S.L. Koolen: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen. R.H.J. Mathijssen: Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pamgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Honoraria (institution): Servier; Honoraria (institution): Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4290 - Characterization of the mechanism of action and efficacy of MEN1611 (PA799), a novel PI3K inhibitor, in breast cancer preclinical models.
Presenter: Alessio Fiascarelli
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2167 - Neat-1: culprit lnRNA tying PIG-C, MSLN, CD80 in TNBC
Presenter: Nada Hussein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1829 - A novel RAF/MEK inhibitor CH5126766 in phase 1 clinical trial has an effectiveness in the combination with eribulin for the treatment of triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Hisako Ono
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4357 - Identification of a stemness-related gene panel associated with BET inhibition in triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Eva Galan-Moya
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5163 - Preclinical Evaluation targeting both IGF1R and IR in Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Presenter: Alex Eustace
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
832 - Monospecific antibody targeting of CDH11 inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and represses cancer stem cell-like phenotype by up-regulating miR-335 in metastatic breast cancer, in vitro and in vivo.
Presenter: Jia-Hong Chen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3781 - Pharmacological screening with Chk1 inhibitors identify synergistic agents to overcome resistance to platinums in basal breast and ovarian cancer
Presenter: Ana Lucia Sanabria
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3275 - Comparison of 11 circulating miRNAs and CA125 kinetics in ovarian cancer during first line treatment: data from the randomized CHIVA trial (a GINECO-GCIG study)
Presenter: Patrick Robelin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3391 - Inhibiting Ehmt2 and Ezh2 histone methyltransferases alters the immune microenvironment in a Trp53-/- murine ovarian cancer model
Presenter: Pavlina Spiliopoulou
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3839 - Fenofibrate impairs pro-tumorigenic potential of cancer stem cell-like cells within drug-resistant prostate cancer cell populations.
Presenter: Tomasz Wróbel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract