Abstract 1166
Background
With the increasement of cancer survivors of prior cancers, more and more pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) are developed as second primary cancers. Whether a history of prior cancer has an inferior impact on survival outcomes for patients with PDAC remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors and assess the survival impact of a history of prior cancer in patients with second primary PDAC.
Methods
Patients with PDAC were retrospectively selected from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific mortalities were compared between patients with or without prior cancer.
Results
From 2004 to 2015, 9235 patients with PDAC from SEER database were included, including 438 (4.74%) patients with a history of prior caner and 8797 (95.26%) patients without a history of prior cancer. A total of 438 cases with prior cancers and 4380 cases without prior cancers were matched successfully after propensity score matching (PSM). The median OS were both 7 months for PDAC patients with or without a history of prior cancer. These two groups of patients had similar survival rates and cancer-specific mortalities before or after PSM analyses. Multivariate analysis also showed that a history of prior cancer was not associated with OS in patients with PDAC.Table:
702P Overall survival rates of patients
| Cancer type | No | Overall survival rates (%) | HR (95% CI) | pa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-year (95% CI) | 2-year (95% CI) | 3-year (95% CI) | ||||
| Whole cohort | 9235 | 36.7(36.6-36.7) | 18.7(18.6-18.7) | 11.7(11.6-11.7) | ||
| Without prior cancer | 8797 | 36.8(36.7-36.9) | 18.7(18.6-18.8) | 11.7(11.6-11.8) | ||
| Prostate cancer | 126 | 35.6(35.3-35.8) | 21.4(21.1-21.5) | 13.3(13.1-13.5) | 1.137(0.928-1.393) | 0.171 |
| Breast cancer | 110 | 36.5(36.4- 36.6) | 16.6(16.5-16.7) | 14.7 (14.6-14.8) | 0.966(0.780-1.197) | 0.749 |
| Renal and bladder cancer | 51 | 35.6(35.5-35.7) | 21.4(21.3-21.5) | 13.3(13.2-13.4) | 1.004(0.732-1.376) | 0.980 |
| Colon and rectum cancer | 43 | 30.2(30.1-30.3) | 15.3(15.2-15.4) | 12.3(12.2-12.4) | 1.149(0.813-1.624) | 0.382 |
| Uterine cancer | 24 | 41.8(41.6-42.0) | 36.6(36.4-36.8) | 36.6(36.4-36.8) | 0.700(0.451-1.086) | 0.165 |
| Lung cancer | 16 | 49.2(49.0-49.4) | 16.4(16.2-16.6) | 8.2(8.1-8.4) | 0.865(0.531-1.408) | 0.572 |
| Small intestinal cancer | 15 | 44.0(43.7-44.3) | 11.7(11.5-11.9) | 11.7(11.5-11.9) | 0.948(0.533-1.687) | 0.855 |
| Oral cancer | 13 | 51.9(51.6-52.2) | 17.3(17.1-17.5) | 0.0 | 0.976(0.544-1.752) | 0.935 |
| Stomach cancer | 12 | 36.5(36.2-36.8) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.150(0.571-2.318) | 0.663 |
| Hepatocellular cancer | 8 | 37.5(37.2-37.8) | 12.5(12.3-12.7) | 12.5(12.3-12.7) | 1.014(0.481-2.138) | 0.971 |
| Matched cohort | 4818 | 35.1(35.0-35.2) | 18.2(18.1-18.2) | 11.7(11.7-11.7) | ||
| Without prior cancer | 4380 | 33.0(32.9-33.1) | 18.2(18.1-18.3) | 11.7(11.6-11.7) | ||
| Prostate cancer | 126 | 35.6(35.3-35.5) | 21.4(21.1-21.5) | 13.3(13.1-13.5) | 0.967(0.708-1.318) | 0.826 |
| Breast cancer | 110 | 36.5(36.4- 36.6) | 16.6(16.5-16.7) | 14. (14.6-14.8) | 0.927(0.751-1.145) | 0.481 |
| Renal and bladder cancer | 51 | 35.6(35.5-35.7) | 21.4(21.3-21.5) | 13.3(13.2-13.4) | 0.967(0.709-1.318) | 0.826 |
| Colon and rectum cancer | 43 | 30.2(30.1-30.3) | 15.3(15.2-15.4) | 12.3(12.2-12.4) | 1.107(0.788-1.557) | 0.521 |
| Uterine cancer | 24 | 41.8(41.6-42.0) | 36.6(36.4-36.8) | 36.6(36.4-36.8) | 0.676(0.439-1.041) | 0.125 |
| Lung cancer | 16 | 49.2(49.0-49.4) | 16.4(16.2-16.6) | 8.2(8.048-8.352) | 0.842(0.520-1.364) | 0.504 |
| Small intestinal cancer | 15 | 44.0(43.7-44.3) | 11.7(11.5-11.9) | 11.7(11.5-11.9) | 0.908(0.517-1.596) | 0.739 |
| Oral cancer | 13 | 51.9(51.6-52.2) | 17.3(17.1-17.5) | 0.0 | 0.943(0.531-1.676) | 0.840 |
| Stomach cancer | 12 | 36.5(36.2-36.8) | 0.00 | 0.0 | 1.093(0.552-2.167) | 0.781 |
| Hepatocellular cancer | 8 | 37.5(37.2-37.8) | 12.5(12.3-12.7) | 12.5(12.3-12.7) | 0.982(0.471-2.010) | 0.961 |
Conclusions
PDAC patients with a history of prior cancer had similar OS and cancer-specific mortalities with those without a cancer history. The inclusion of patients with prior cancer into clinical trials of PDAC may be considerable.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Grants: The National Natural Science Foundation of China (81171890; 81672390), and the Major National Scientific Research Projects of China (No. 2013CB910304).
Disclosure
The authors has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3905 - Loss of CDX-2 expression is an independent poor prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Krittiya Korphaisarn
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3963 - Robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for radical resection of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Zhengchuan Niu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3989 - Bevacizumab as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer: Updated results from the AVANT phase III Study by the GERCOR Group
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4741 - Real world data on adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colorectal cancer – the role of tumor side
Presenter: Camila Araujo de Carvalho
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4973 - Oncological Outcome and Safety of Bevacizumab (BV) Therapy in Patients with Occlusive Colon Cancer and Self-Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS)
Presenter: Vilma Pacheco-Barcia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2295 - Active chronic hepatitis B increases the risk of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer- a retrospective clinical study of 7187 consecutive cases of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer
Presenter: Lei Zhao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3845 - Comprehensive Evaluation of Recurrence Risk (CERR) Score for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Development and Validation
Presenter: Wei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1976 - BRAF-mutated colorectal metastases: what is the benefit of liver surgery? Results from a cohort of 91 patients.
Presenter: Sahir Javed
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2688 - The smallest colorectal liver metastasis size as a prognosis factor after laparoscopic liver resection
Presenter: Baptiste Cervantes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4961 - Validation of GAME score risk groups in resected colorectal cancer liver metastases and the prognostic relevance of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutation analysis
Presenter: Berta Martin-Cullell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract