Abstract 3618
Background
Advances in therapy, surgery and loco-regional procedures improved survival of patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Interruptions, defined Drug Holidays (DH), could reduce toxicity in pts with stable disease. We evaluated the association between DH and overall survival (OS).
Methods
754 consecutive pts treated for mCRC, at University Hospital of Udine and IRCCS CRO of Aviano from 1/1/2005 to 15/03/2017, were included. DH was defined as 56 or more consecutive days of interruption, during first line. The association of DH to OS was evaluated through uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses. OS was estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves.
Results
Overall, 459 (60.9%) pts received continuous treatment while 255 (33.8%) a DH (5.3% missing data). After median follow-up of 68.6 months, median OS was 23.15 months. By univariate analysis, KRAS (HR 1.39; 95%CI 1.17-1.66; p < 0.001) and BRAF mutation (HR 1.39; 95%CI 1.02-1.90; p = 0.035), nodes (HR 1.92; 95%CI 1.49-2.46; p < 0.001) peritoneum (HR 1.72; 95%CI 1.38-2.15; p < 0.001), bone (HR 1.93; 95%CI 1.93; 1.02-3.64; pp = 0.043) and brain (HR 13.51; 95%CI 5.94-30.74; p < 0.001) involvement, ECOG PS (1 vs 0: HR 1.84; 95%CI 1.35-2.50,p<0.001; 2 vs 0: HR 2.87; 95%CI 1.89-4.33, p < 0.001), >1 metastatic sites (HR 1.61;95%CI 1.36-1.91; p < 0.001), DH (HR 0.43; 95%CI 0.36-0.52; p < 0.001), metastasectomy (HR 0.32; 95%CI 0.24-0.44; p < 0.001), left sidedness (HR 0.70; 95%ICI 0.58-0.86; p < 0.001), rectal tumor (HR 0.71; 95%CI 0.58-0.88; p = 0.002) and thermo-ablations (HR 0.34; 95%CI 0.25-0.47; p < 0.001) were associated with OS. In multivariate, BRAF mutation (HR 1.82; 95%CI 1.15-2.87; p = 0.010); ECOG PS 1 (HR 2.08; 95%CI 1.29-3.35; p = 0.003) and 2 (HR 3.57; 95%IC 1.91-6.63; p < 0.001) had worst prognosis. Conversely, DH (HR 0.44; 95%CI 0.35-0.57; p < 0.001), metastasectomy (HR 0.33; 95%CI 0.20-0.55; p < 0.001), thermo-ablations (HR 0.44; 95%CI 0.28-0.70; p = 0.001) and left sidedness (HR 0.72; 95%CI 0.55-0.95; p = 0.018) had better OS. Intriguingly, median OS was 35.3 months for DH and 18 months for continuous therapy.
Conclusions
DH was independently associated with better prognosis. Probably, DH is a proxy of better prognosis that clinicians intercept. Therefore, in accurately selected pts, DH can be safely offered.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Dipartimento di Oncologia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
F. Puglisi: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Hoffmann-La Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pierre-Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5458 - Baseline characteristics from CLARINET FORTE: Evaluating lanreotide autogel (LAN) 120 mg every 14 days in patients with progressive pancreatic or midgut neuroendocrine tumours during a standard first-line LAN regimen.
Presenter: Philippe Ruszniewski
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1234 - Analysis of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade biomarker and immune infiltrates in Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma
Presenter: Jia Zhang Xing
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1517 - Diabetes Is Associated With Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Growth and Metastasis
Presenter: Zhiyao Fan
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2145 - Investigation of the reclassification of G1/G2 pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms by WHO 2017 classification
Presenter: Takahiro Yokose
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3134 - Treatment with somatostatin analogues after radiopeptide therapy
Presenter: Daria Handkiewicz Junak
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2191 - Safety and Tolerability of Surufatinib in Western Patients with Solid Tumors
Presenter: Erika Hamilton
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3253 - The impact of tumour absorbed dosimetry with survival outcomes after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in metastatic neuroendocrine tumours.
Presenter: Rahul Ladwa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3581 - Opportunist and Serious Infections in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated With Everolimus: A Multicenter Study of Real World Patients
Presenter: Carine Mauro
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5374 - Establishment of Prognostic Nomogram Based on the Metastatic Lymph Nodes Ratio for Patients with Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumour
Presenter: yaobin lin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3951 - Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as an independent predictive factor in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Presenter: Sofia Ferreira
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract