Abstract 1863
Background
The waiting time for cancer diagnosis and treatment could influence patients’ survival. However, in Poland the waiting time is still long. In Poland, medical care is financed by the government and free for patients, but in a situation of long waiting times for diagnostic tests or in cases where it is impossible to obtain some other health services, patients use the private sector. The rationale for this study was to figure out if there are any difficulties in the oncological system and assessment of whether patients have to use the private sector.
Methods
The study was carried out on a group of 384 patients who were being treated for malignant neoplasm in five oncological centers in Poland. A questionnaire was prepared specifically for this study and each patient was interviewed individually. The questionnaire was validated on a group of 20 patients. The measure of compliance was calculated using Cohen’s Kappa coefficient. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee. All of the participants had submitted a signed consent form.
Results
202 women and 180 men (2 no data) were analyzed, median age 65 years. 67% of patients declared problems with getting social service and significant differences in getting social service were observed between various regions of Poland (p < 0.001). One third of patients (32%) used private services during the diagnostic process. Patients with higher education showed significantly more frequent problems (p = 0.03). 91% of patients declared difficulties during treatment. Those who showed significantly more frequent problems were: women (p = 0.04), younger patients (p = 0.0015), professionally active (p = 0.025) with higher education (p < 0.001), living in cities (p = 0.016). More than half of patients with higher education (54%) paid for healthcare services in comparison with patients with lower education levels (average 25%) (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Cancer patients have some difficulties in the oncological system in Poland. The younger people, those with higher education, the professionally active, and those living in cities seem to be more aware of their rights. The proper solution could be to introduce corrections in oncological organization to avoid the need of using private services.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2553 - Interim analysis of a phase Ib study of cobimetinib plus atezolizumab in patients with advanced BRAFV600 wild type melanoma progressing on prior anti-PD-L1 therapy
Presenter: Shahneen Sandhu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2743 - The Impact of Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapy in Melanoma Brain Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Presenter: Mario Mandala
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5479 - Intracranial Anti-Tumor Activity in Melanoma Brain Metastases with Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib: A Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis
Presenter: Jose Lutzky
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3560 - Outcomes of Patients with Melanoma Brain Metastases (MBM) Treated with Standard of Care Therapy After Being Excluded from MBM-Specific Clinical Trials
Presenter: Kourtney Holbrook
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3175 - The analysis of current treatment outcomes in melanoma patients with brain metastases
Presenter: Joanna Placzke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4550 - A multivariate model to define prognostic groups among patients with melanoma brain metastases: a 10-year retrospective cohort study
Presenter: Giacomo Pelizzari
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4191 - The immune landscape of melanoma significantly influences survival in patients with highly mutated tumors.
Presenter: Robert Ferguson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1625 - Final Results from Phase II of Combination with Canerpaturev (formerly HF10), an Oncolytic Viral Immunotherapy, and Ipilimumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma in 2nd-or later line treatment
Presenter: Kenji Yokota
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5346 - Evaluating polygenic risk score prediction model for melanoma prognosis
Presenter: Miriam Potrony
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5477 - Impact of sarcopenia in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy
Presenter: Maria Grazia Vitale
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract