Abstract 5074
Background
Severe toxicity as a result of Fluoropyrimidine treatments appears in up 30% of patients. The reduce activity of DPD is one of the main cause of severe adverse events. Up to 8% of the population have low levels of DPD, and up to 0.5% of the population completely lack the enzyme. We assessed the effect of prospective screening for the 4 most relevant variants (DPYD*2A [rs3918290, c.1905 + 1G>A, IVS14 + 1G>A], c.2846A>T [rs67376798, D949V], c.1679T>G [rs55886062, DPYD*13, I560S], c.1236G>A [rs56038477, E412E, in haplotype B3]) and rs34743033 TYMS, on patient safety and dose individualization in daily clinical practice.
Methods
We described our experience in a Tertiary University Hospital. We reviewed 208 patients with gastrointestinal cancer who were planned to receive fluoropyrimide treatment and we did prospective genotyping for DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A and rs34743033 TYMS. Heterozygous DPD variant allele carriers received an initial dose reduction of 25% (c.2846A>T and c.1236G>A) or 50% (DPYD*2A and c.1679T>G), and DPYD wild-type patients were treated according to the current standard of care.
Results
From April 2017 to March 2019, 208 patients were pre-tested. 8 patients (3´8%) were heterozygous DPD variant allele carriers and 200 (96´2%) were DPD wild-type patients. Overall, fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity was higher in DPD variant carriers (2 [25%] of 8 patients) than in wild-type patients (70 [35%] of 200 patients). 2 patients with c.1236G>A and rs34743033 TYMS heterozygous were necessary to disrupt treatment in spite of dose reduction because of severe diarrhea. However, the other 6 heterozygous have low grade toxicity with reduction preplanned.
Conclusions
Life-threatening toxicities could be presented in patients with DPD deficiency if they are treated with standar dose of fluoropyridimes. Last colorectal cancer ESMO guidelines do not recommend testing DPD deficient up front. It recommend in case of patients who experience severe toxicity, DPD levels should be tested before 5-FU is re-introduced. We suggest due to our control of potential toxicities that implementation of DPD genotype individualised dosing should be a new standard of care.
Legal entity responsible for the study: Mediano Rambla.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4413 - Infigratinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusions/translocations: the PROOF trial
Presenter: Ghassan Abou-Alfa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4710 - Phase 3 (COSMIC-312) study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) vs sorafenib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who have not received previous systemic anticancer therapy
Presenter: Lorenza Rimassa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5509 - A Randomized Controlled, Open label, Adaptive Phase-3 Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of EndoTAG-1 Plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine alone in Patients with Measurable Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas Failed on FOLFIRINOX Treatment (NCT03126435)
Presenter: Li-Tzong Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1463 - Modified FOLFOX versus modified FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction – Moonlight, a randomized phase 2 trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO.
Presenter: Sylvie Lorenzen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2392 - GLOW: Randomized Phase 3 Study of Zolbetuximab + CAPOX Compared With Placebo + CAPOX as First-line Treatment of Patients With CLD18.2⁺/HER2⁻ Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Manish Shah
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5217 - PRODIGE67_UCGI33 ARION: Association of Radiochemotherapy and Immunotherapy for the treatment of unresectable Oesophageal caNcer: a comparative randomized phase II trial
Presenter: Rosine Guimbaud
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1726 - Randomized phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel + ramucirumab versus weekly nab-paclitaxel + ramucirumab for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination refractory to first-line therapy: WJOG10617G/P-SELECT
Presenter: Kenro Hirata
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2279 - FRONTiER: A Feasibility Trial of Nivolumab With Neoadjuvant CF or DCF Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma
Presenter: Shun Yamamoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4912 - A phase Ib/II study of AK104, a PD-1/CTLA-4 Bispecific Antibody, Combined With mXELOX as First-line Therapy for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Jiafu Ji
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3780 - Perioperative atezolizumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone in patients with resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: DANTE, a randomized, open-label phase II trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO and the SAKK.
Presenter: Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract