Abstract 5074
Background
Severe toxicity as a result of Fluoropyrimidine treatments appears in up 30% of patients. The reduce activity of DPD is one of the main cause of severe adverse events. Up to 8% of the population have low levels of DPD, and up to 0.5% of the population completely lack the enzyme. We assessed the effect of prospective screening for the 4 most relevant variants (DPYD*2A [rs3918290, c.1905 + 1G>A, IVS14 + 1G>A], c.2846A>T [rs67376798, D949V], c.1679T>G [rs55886062, DPYD*13, I560S], c.1236G>A [rs56038477, E412E, in haplotype B3]) and rs34743033 TYMS, on patient safety and dose individualization in daily clinical practice.
Methods
We described our experience in a Tertiary University Hospital. We reviewed 208 patients with gastrointestinal cancer who were planned to receive fluoropyrimide treatment and we did prospective genotyping for DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A and rs34743033 TYMS. Heterozygous DPD variant allele carriers received an initial dose reduction of 25% (c.2846A>T and c.1236G>A) or 50% (DPYD*2A and c.1679T>G), and DPYD wild-type patients were treated according to the current standard of care.
Results
From April 2017 to March 2019, 208 patients were pre-tested. 8 patients (3´8%) were heterozygous DPD variant allele carriers and 200 (96´2%) were DPD wild-type patients. Overall, fluoropyrimidine-related severe toxicity was higher in DPD variant carriers (2 [25%] of 8 patients) than in wild-type patients (70 [35%] of 200 patients). 2 patients with c.1236G>A and rs34743033 TYMS heterozygous were necessary to disrupt treatment in spite of dose reduction because of severe diarrhea. However, the other 6 heterozygous have low grade toxicity with reduction preplanned.
Conclusions
Life-threatening toxicities could be presented in patients with DPD deficiency if they are treated with standar dose of fluoropyridimes. Last colorectal cancer ESMO guidelines do not recommend testing DPD deficient up front. It recommend in case of patients who experience severe toxicity, DPD levels should be tested before 5-FU is re-introduced. We suggest due to our control of potential toxicities that implementation of DPD genotype individualised dosing should be a new standard of care.
Legal entity responsible for the study: Mediano Rambla.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3907 - Exploration of efficacious alternative regorafenib regimens to manage hand-foot-skin-reaction (HFSR)
Presenter: Axel Grothey
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3958 - Quality of Life (QoL) in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) in the Real World: Final Results of a European Survey
Presenter: Zorana Maravic
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3563 - BISQUIT: A Randomized Phase II Study of the Administration of Prebiotics and Probiotics During Definitive Treatment With Chemotherapy-radiotherapy for Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal
Presenter: Rachel Riechelmann
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1184 - iSCORE: Immunotherapy Sequencing in COlon and REctal Cancer
Presenter: Fiona Turkes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3346 - Phase II study of preoperative (PREOP) chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) plus avelumab (AVE) in patients (PTS) with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): The AVANA Study
Presenter: Lisa Salvatore
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3895 - A phase II study of capecitabine plus concomitant radiation therapy followed by durvalumab (MEDI4736) as preoperative treatment in rectal cancer: PANDORA study.
Presenter: Maria Aurelia Barbera
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2012 - Open Label Phase III Study of Arfolitixorin vs. Leucovorin in mFOLFOX-6 for First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: AGENT
Presenter: Josep Tabernero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2198 - SOLSTICE, a phase 3, randomized, open label study of trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (bev) versus capecitabine+bev for the 1L treatment of patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are not candidates for intensive therapy
Presenter: Thierry Andre
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2921 - A Phase Ib/ II Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of CXD101 in Combination with the PD-1 Inhibitor Nivolumab in Patients with Metastatic, Previously-Treated, Microsatellite-Stable (MSS) Colorectal Carcinoma (short title CAROSELL)
Presenter: Mark Saunders
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3695 - A Phase 1b/2 Study of Onvansertib (PCM-075) in Combination with FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab for Second Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Patients with a KRAS Mutation
Presenter: Heinz Josef Lenz
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract