Abstract 2888
Background
In various types of solid tumor, pathological microscopic features can be used as prognostic biomarkers. We intended to develop a pathological microscopic features (PMFs) pattern for individual survival assessment in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
Methods
We retrospectively included 1229 patients with NPC who had received radical radiotherapy with/without chemotherapy. The PMFs differently digitized were extracted using the software QuPath (version 0.1.2.Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK) in the training cohort (Guangzhou training cohort, n = 739) to bulid a pathological feature classifier using a penalized regression model. The prognostic accuracy of the pathological feature classifier was validated in the internal validation cohort (Guangzhou validation cohort, n = 316) and one external validation cohort (Chenzhou validation cohort, n=170).The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).
Results
We found 143 PMFs in the H&E image of NPC with the whole slide image (WSI) scanning. In the training cohort a pathological micromarker of survival risk in NPC (PMSRN) that consisted of 14 PMFs was generated to classify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Patients with high-risk scores in the training cohort had shorter PFS (HR 2.16, 1.61 -2.89; p = 0.000), and DMFS (HR 1.87, 1.27 -2.75; p = 0.001) than patients with low-risk scores. We developed a nomogram based on the PMSRN and other variables that predicted an individual’s survival risk and the c-index of this nomogram (C-index=0.759, 95% CI: 0.717 -0.801) was equal to other nomograms. Furthermore, among patients with high-risk scores in the combined training and internal cohorts, ICT had better PFS to those who received CCRT alone (p = 0.033), whereas those with low-risk scores ICT had similar PFS to CCRT alone (p = 0.363). These results were validated in the internal external validation cohort.
Conclusions
The PMSRN is a reliable prognostic tool for survival risk in NPC patients and might be able to predict which patients need to receive ICT or not. It might guide treatment decisions for NPC patients.
Clinical trial identification
ChiECRCT20190034.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sun Yet-sen University Cancer Center.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract