Abstract 4050
Background
The DiMaio (D), EPSILoN (E) and plasma microRNA signature classifier (MSC), are 3 diverse clinico-biochemical and molecular scores able to independently predict prognosis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients (pts) treated with immunotherapy (IO). By assessing the ability of each test a combined score (SC) called DEMo was developed. The study aims to prospectively evaluate the prognostic value of DEMo in aNSCLC pts treated with IO.
Methods
We included in the analyses 166 aNSCLC pts treated in 1L (n = 47) and further-lines (n = 119) with IO at Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan. For all pts we obtained complete necessary data for both clinical SC: D (sex, histology, ECOG-PS stage, uses of platinum-based therapy at 1L and response to 1L) and E (ECOG-PS, Smoke, Liver, LDH, NL-ratio). MSC was prospectively evaluated in plasma samples collected at baseline IO and the risk level was assessed. Endpoints were median overall survival (mOS), progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall response rate (ORR). Kaplan-Meier and Cox model were used to generate survival curves and multivariate analyses, respectively.
Results
In multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, smoke and ECOG-PS each score remain independently significant for both PFS (D: HR = 1.99, CI95% 1.21–3.03, p = 0.007; E: HR = 1.87 CI95% 1.12 – 3.10, p = 0.016; MSC: HR = 1.56, CI95% 1.03–2.37, p = 0.0370) and OS (D: HR = 3.12, CI95% 1.80–5.41, p = 0.0001; E: HR = 2.21, CI95% 1.28–3.79, p = 0.0041; MSC: HR = 2.03, CI95% 1.30–3.17, p = 0.0019). DEMo separated patients in 4-risk groups (gr) based on the presence of 3–2–1–0 poor prognostic SC. Strata had 0%–7%–20%–46% 18 months (mo) PFS (p < 0.0001) and 0%–23%–44%–78% 18 mo OS (p < 0.0001). We further combined DEMo gr 3/2 and 0/1 for multivariate analysis: mPFS and mOS for gr 3/2 vs 0/1 were 2.1 vs 6.4 mo (HR = 2.06, CI95% 1.26–3.36, p = 0.0038) and 4.1 vs 20.3 mo (HR 3.17, CI95% 1.91–5.24, p < 0.0001). The ORR was 2.9 (CI95% 1.4–6.0) fold higher for gr 0/1 compare to 3/2 (p = 0.0034).
Conclusions
We created a composite clinic-molecular combined biomarker classifier able to better predict prognosis compared to each single SC and to select patients who less likely benefit from IO. DEMo could be a useful tool to guide choices in aNSCLC.
Clinical trial identification
The authors.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Italy.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2108 - Biomarker analyses of ramucirumab in patients with platinum refractory urothelial cancer from RANGE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3090 - Comparison of Immuno-Oncology (IO) Biomarkers in Adenocarcinoma (ACB), Urothelial Carcinoma (UCB) and Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCCB) of the Bladder, with interim results from PURE01
Presenter: Daniele Raggi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5211 - Potential role of a clinical, taxonomical classification and RNA expression integrated signature to predict response to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients
Presenter: Albert Font
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3206 - Hyperphosphatemia due to Erdafitinib (a Pan-FGFR Inhibitor) and Anti-tumor Activity Among Patients (Pts) with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (UC)
Presenter: Scott Tagawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3110 - Prognostic role of FGFR Mutations and FGFR mRNA expression in metastatic urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD(L1) inhibitors in first and second line setting
Presenter: Florian Roghmann
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3564 - Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) utility as a biomarker for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean-Michel Lavoie
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2760 - Comparative analysis of tumor mutational burden (TMB) prediction methods and its association with determinants of the tumor immune microenvironment of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC)
Presenter: Markus Eckstein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2513 - The Immunoscore in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical significance for pathological response and survival
Presenter: Elise Nassif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2835 - Genomic analysis of urothelial cancer and associations with treatment choice and outcome
Presenter: David Sarid
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5763 - cfDNA is an acceptable but insufficient means of characterizing FGFR3 mutation in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC)
Presenter: Sumanta Pal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract