Abstract 5101
Background
Recent reports suggested gaps in knowledge and misperceptions regarding lung cancer (LC) in the general public and physicians respectively. We aimed to further investigate the topic.
Methods
From February 21st to March 22nd, 2019, two online surveys were led in parallel among French people (n = 6001) and physicians (GP, n = 273; pulmonologists, n = 97; oncologists, n = 67). Questions aimed to assess people’s knowledge about LC prevalence, severity, diagnosis, management and treatments, early screening, as well of social stigma, and also understandings from physicians about public perception.
Results
LC was ranked as the 2nd most feared cancer (n = 1980; 33%) and perceived as very or extremely serious by 96% of people (n = 5760). Half of French people (n = 3360) declared knowing at least one other risk factor than tobacco, and except for asbestos (n = 5220; 87%), other potential risk factors were subjects to low to moderate levels of belief. The general population ranked LC as the 3rd easiest cancer to diagnose among French people (n = 2220; 37%) and 57% (n = 3420) believed that diagnosis was made early after symptoms onset. The general population was not aware of the majority of the symptoms beside blood in the sputum and respiratory symptoms. LC was ranked only the 5th cancer (n = 1260; 21%) among those for which medical progress had been the most substantial, whereas physicians ranked it second (n = 201; 46%). Also the public was not aware of therapeutic progress as immunotherapy. Physicians tended to be more optimistic about actual treatment improvement than the public and for 90% of them (n = 393), systematic screening of at-risk population would have a significant impact on mortality data by LC.
Conclusions
Our study confirms the substantial gaps in LC knowledge from the general public and highlights several venues for improvement of communication and public awareness on LC in France.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
AstraZeneca.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
J. Cadranel: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Boerhinger Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda. C. Chouaid: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi Aventis; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen. J.B. Stern: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Fees for presentation in a Medtronic symposium which were donated to our association.: Medtronic. A. Vergnenegre: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Teva; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Clovis Oncology. C. Cortot: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. L. Guery: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. K. Belkhiria: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. I. De la Porte: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. M. Urbieta: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. M. Perol: Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2927 - Singapore Caregiver Quality Of Life Scale (SCQOLS): Turkish Validity and Reliability Study
Presenter: Nur Basak
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5066 - Screening for Psicosocial Distress in recently diagnosed cancer patients
Presenter: Eva Baillès
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6074 - Socio-demographic characteristics and quality of life analysis of cancer survivors followed at a Primary Care Center.
Presenter: Begona Grana Suarez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5129 - The adhesion in the screening measures in carrying patients of breast cancer and ovary hereditary and the relationship with the psychological aspects
Presenter: Melinda Concepcion
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5635 - Assessment of emotional discomfort of oncological patients in the first nursing visit at Donostia University Hospital
Presenter: Elena Uranga
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
858 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of the distress thermometer for the screening of distress in Chinese patients with cancer
Presenter: Hui Hui Sun
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4475 - Pharmacist and Nurse (PN) Led Melanoma Immunotherapy Clinic: Patient Experience Survey
Presenter: Dharmisha Chauhan
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1871 - Phone Triage & Acute Review Clinics: The emerging role of the Oncology Specialist Nurse
Presenter: Fiona Barrett
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5193 - Patient reported outcomes during immunotherapy: symptom burden in daily clinical practice
Presenter: José Koldenhof
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2453 - Factors related to hospital length of stay, re-admissions and unplanned care for patients with cancer, an on-going study
Presenter: Helena Ullgren
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract