Abstract 3864
Background
Role of Tg levels as a biomarker in RAI-R DTC during MKI is unclear. Falling levels of Tg after starting MKI treatment has been previously reported, with a higher reduction in patients who achieve response. However, transient Tg oscillations are a common phenomenon during therapy without a clear correlation with progressive disease (PD). In the present study, we analyze the correlation between Tg oscillations and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with RAI-R DTC during MKI treatment.
Methods
Thirty-seven consecutive patients were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: pathology confirmed RAI-R DTC, age >18 years, MKI treatment in the first or second line and serial Tg determinations along with the follow-up. Variations in Tg levels during MKI treatment were evaluated. As exploratory hypothesis, we considered the “Tg elevation non-PD related”, defined as a significant elevation of Tg higher than 50% compared with previous measure, not related with PD by RECIST criteria, followed by a Tg reduction in a subsequent determination, in patients with an initial Tg reduction after starting MKI treatment.
Results
33 patients were included in the final analysis. Most MKI treatments were Sorafenib (44%), Lenvatinib (27%), Vandetanib (10%) and Axitinib (8%). Median duration of treatment was 15.5 months, and median PFS 20.2 months. Patients with any Tg levels reduction compared with baseline along MKI treatment showed a better PFS (23.5 vs. 3.6 months, p < 0.001). A Tg reduction >50% from baseline on the first month after starting MKI also had a benefit in PFS (27.7 vs. 14.2, p 0.02). 20.6% of cases had the nadir of Tg response beyond the first month of treatment. 34.4% of cases presented Tg elevation non-PD related along with follow-up (median number of elevations per patient: 2), with a better PFS compared with patients with other Tg oscillation patterns (29.9 vs. 15.5 months, p0.008).
Conclusions
Tg elevation non-PD related was associated with a better PFS compared with patients with other Tg variation patterns. Treatment with MKIs should not be stopped or changed based on Tg variations.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J. Hernando Cubero: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eisai, Ipsen, Roche, Angelini Pharma; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen, Novartis, AAA, Roche, AstraZeneca, Eisai. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3905 - Loss of CDX-2 expression is an independent poor prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Krittiya Korphaisarn
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3963 - Robot-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for radical resection of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Zhengchuan Niu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3989 - Bevacizumab as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer: Updated results from the AVANT phase III Study by the GERCOR Group
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4741 - Real world data on adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colorectal cancer – the role of tumor side
Presenter: Camila Araujo de Carvalho
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4973 - Oncological Outcome and Safety of Bevacizumab (BV) Therapy in Patients with Occlusive Colon Cancer and Self-Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS)
Presenter: Vilma Pacheco-Barcia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2295 - Active chronic hepatitis B increases the risk of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer- a retrospective clinical study of 7187 consecutive cases of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer
Presenter: Lei Zhao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3845 - Comprehensive Evaluation of Recurrence Risk (CERR) Score for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Development and Validation
Presenter: Wei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1976 - BRAF-mutated colorectal metastases: what is the benefit of liver surgery? Results from a cohort of 91 patients.
Presenter: Sahir Javed
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2688 - The smallest colorectal liver metastasis size as a prognosis factor after laparoscopic liver resection
Presenter: Baptiste Cervantes
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4961 - Validation of GAME score risk groups in resected colorectal cancer liver metastases and the prognostic relevance of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutation analysis
Presenter: Berta Martin-Cullell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract