Abstract 2935
Background
Overall survival (OS) has become the definitive endpoint in oncology clinical trials, but may be difficult to assess due to need for lengthy follow-up, factors related to trial design or impacted by study crossover. Progression free survival (PFS) is a common primary endpoint, but, differential response to subsequent therapy may affect the correlation of PFS and OS. The European Medicines Agency encourages the use of PFS2, defined as time from initial study randomization to 2nd disease progression or death from any cause. The surrogacy of PFS2 for OS has not been confirmed. This analysis used published data from solid tumor clinical studies to assess whether PFS2 and OS are correlated.
Methods
A systematic literature search identified solid tumor oncology studies that included data for PFS, PFS2, and OS. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts and main-text of study reports for eligibility, and collected data on median time to PFS2, PFS or time from 1st progression to 2nd disease progression or death, and median time to OS. The correlation between PFS2 and OS was assessed and verified in two steps: (1) Kendall’s Tau (Kendall rank correlation coefficient) statistics and Pearson’s correlation coefficient in randomized controlled trials (RCTs); (2) Meta-analysis with the random effects model to compute the pooled correlation of PFS2 and OS.
Results
In total, 133 studies met the search criteria and 15 trials had complete PFS2 and OS data (28 individual treatment and control arms) in ovarian, gastric, colorectal, prostate, lung, renal and breast tumors. A positive correlation was observed between PFS2 and OS (Kendall’s Tau = 0.7 (95% CIs 0.54, 0.78) using all 15 studies. Data from the 10 RCTs showed a Pearson’s correlation coefficient = 0.86. An additional meta-analysis of 3 tumors (breast, colorectal, and lung cancer), where more than 1 study per indication was available (7 studies; 17 individual arms), identified a Spearman’s correlation coefficient = 0.84 (p = 0.0001; 95% CIs 0.71, 0.96).
Conclusions
In this retrospective analysis in solid tumors, PFS2 was positively correlated with OS. The strong correlation provides confidence in using PFS2 as a surrogate for OS before OS data are mature or when OS cannot be assessed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Editorial assistance was provided by Ann C Sherwood, PhD with funding from Janssen Pharmaceuticals.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Janssen Pharmaceuticals.
Funding
Janssen Pharmaceuticals.
Disclosure
P.N. Mainwaring: Leadership role, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Licensing / Royalties: XING Technologies P/L; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer. L. Zhang: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Janssen. S.D. Mundle: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Janssen. K. Liu: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Janssen. E. Pollozi: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: IDEA Pharma; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen. A. Gray: Leadership role, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: IDEA Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen. M. Wildgust: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Janssen.
Resources from the same session
920 - Efficacy of intravenous (IV) NEPA, a fixed NK1/5-HT3 receptor antagonist (RA) combination, for prevention of CINV following cisplatin- and anthracycline cyclophosphamide (AC)-based chemotherapy (CT)
Presenter: Lee Schwartzberg
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5146 - Efficacy of olanzapine combination in prevention of nausea & vomiting in highly emetogenic chemotherapy
Presenter: Smitha Saldanha
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1947 - Patient-reported outcome data during real-world use of NEPA for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in high-risk platin-receiving patients - A prospective multicenter trial
Presenter: Meinolf Karthaus
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
6163 - A study evaluating steroid induced metabolic syndrome after antiemetic dexamethasone therapy in patients received high emetic risk chemotherapy
Presenter: Hee Jun Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2154 - High incidence of nausea during initial and repeated courses if intravenous chemotherapy in patients receiving guideline consistent antiemetic prophylaxis - a prospective, observational, real world study.
Presenter: Teresa Smit
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1637 - "Randomised controlled trial of Scalp Cooling (SC) for the prevention of Chemotherapy Induced Alopecia (CIA)”
Presenter: Jyoti Bajpai
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5351 - Performance of the ‘4S rule’ to predict short-term outcomes in cancer outpatients with unsuspected pulmonary embolism.
Presenter: David Pesántez Coronel
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1189 - Prevalence of venous thromboembolism based on intensive screening for patients with advanced solid tumor in prospective observational study
Presenter: Shota Omori
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4340 - Short-term outcomes of cancer patients with pulmonary embolism according to the setting (hospital-acquired vs. outpatient) at diagnosis.
Presenter: Diego Muñoz Guglielmetti
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4658 - Patient-reported outcomes associated with switching to rivaroxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with active cancer
Presenter: Alexander Cohen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract