Abstract 2471
Background
Patients with early breast cancer (EBC) achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) have a favorable prognosis. Breast surgery and more chemotherapy treatment might be avoided in patients in whom the presence of residual tumor can be ruled out with high confidence. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) in predicting pCR and long-term outcome after NACT.
Methods
Patients with EBC, who had undergone CE-MRI before and after NACT, were retrospectively analyzed (n = 421), and regarding to the absence (radiologic complete remission; rCR) or presence (no-rCR) of residual contrast enhancement.
Results
Overall rCR and pCR rates were 35% (147/421) and 36% (154/421), respectively. We found a total of 70% (101/144) of rCR corresponded to a pCR (meaning the positive predictive value - PPV). In contrast, in 80% (219/272) of patients, residual tumor observed on MRI was pathologically confirmed (meaning the negative predictive value - NPV). Sensitivity to detect a pCR was 65% (101/154), while specificity to detect residual tumor and accuracy were 83% (219/262); and 76% (320/421), respectively. The PPV was significantly lower in luminal compared to HER2 positive and triple negative tumors (10/34 = 29 % vs. 50/62 = 81% and 41/48 = 85% respectively). The concordance between rCR and pCR was moderate (Cohen’s kappa − 0.5) but with low level in luminal tumors (Coheńs Kappa – 0.3). In multivariate analysis both assessments were significantly associated with disease free survival (rCR : HR:0,344 P = 0.001; pCR : HR : 0,154 P = 0.000), but not in luminal tumors (rCR : HR:0,813 P = 0.692; pCR : HR : 0,326 P = 0.275).
Conclusions
The accuracy of preoperative CE-MRI to predict pCR after NACT for EBC is moderate but in luminal tumors did not accurately predict pCR. However, rCR was strongly associated with favorable RFS, especially in HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer tumors.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4413 - Infigratinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusions/translocations: the PROOF trial
Presenter: Ghassan Abou-Alfa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4710 - Phase 3 (COSMIC-312) study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) vs sorafenib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who have not received previous systemic anticancer therapy
Presenter: Lorenza Rimassa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5509 - A Randomized Controlled, Open label, Adaptive Phase-3 Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of EndoTAG-1 Plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine alone in Patients with Measurable Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas Failed on FOLFIRINOX Treatment (NCT03126435)
Presenter: Li-Tzong Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1463 - Modified FOLFOX versus modified FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction – Moonlight, a randomized phase 2 trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO.
Presenter: Sylvie Lorenzen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2392 - GLOW: Randomized Phase 3 Study of Zolbetuximab + CAPOX Compared With Placebo + CAPOX as First-line Treatment of Patients With CLD18.2⁺/HER2⁻ Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Manish Shah
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5217 - PRODIGE67_UCGI33 ARION: Association of Radiochemotherapy and Immunotherapy for the treatment of unresectable Oesophageal caNcer: a comparative randomized phase II trial
Presenter: Rosine Guimbaud
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1726 - Randomized phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel + ramucirumab versus weekly nab-paclitaxel + ramucirumab for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination refractory to first-line therapy: WJOG10617G/P-SELECT
Presenter: Kenro Hirata
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2279 - FRONTiER: A Feasibility Trial of Nivolumab With Neoadjuvant CF or DCF Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma
Presenter: Shun Yamamoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4912 - A phase Ib/II study of AK104, a PD-1/CTLA-4 Bispecific Antibody, Combined With mXELOX as First-line Therapy for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Jiafu Ji
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3780 - Perioperative atezolizumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone in patients with resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: DANTE, a randomized, open-label phase II trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO and the SAKK.
Presenter: Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract