Abstract 4370
Background
In the multi-center investigator-initiated OpACIN-neo trial, patients (pts) with macroscopic stage III melanoma were randomized (stratified by center) to 3 different dosing schemes of neoadjuvant (neoadj) IPI+NIVO. Two cycles IPI 1mg/kg + NIVO3 mg/kg was identified as the most favorable regimen with 20% grade 3-4 adverse events and a pathological response rate (pRR) of 77%. After a median follow-up (FU) of 8.3 months (mo) none (0/86) of the pts with a pathologic (path) response had relapsed, while 9/21 (43%) without a path response relapsed. Post-hoc analyses were conducted to investigate potential differences between pts treated in Europe (EU) and in Australia (AUS).
Methods
Baseline patient characteristics, safety and efficacy in terms of path response were evaluated in pts treated in EU (n = 48) and AUS (n = 38). Multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression method. Median FU was 9.3mo for EU pts and 6.9mo for AUS pts.
Results
Baseline characteristics (AUS vs EU) differed in age (median 60 vs 53 year [yr], p = 0.017) and AUS pts were more likely to be male (65.8 vs 50.0%, p = 0.142) and have an unknown primary melanoma (36.8 vs 20.8%, p = 0.100); no difference in PD-L1 expression was observed. There was a trend to a higher pRR for AUS pts than for EU pts (84.2% vs 68.1%, OR 2.50, p = 0.092). pRR was also higher for pts >60 yr compared to £60 yr (91.2% vs 64.7%, OR 5.64, p = 0.010) and males vs females (83.7% vs 63.9%, OR 2.90, p = 0.041). Multivariate analysis including continent, age and gender showed an adjusted OR for path response of 1.85 (p = 0.289) for AUS vs EU pts, an OR of 4.89 (p = 0.021) for pts >60yrs vs £60yrs and an OR of 2.50 (p = 0.095) for males vs females. The frequency of high grade toxicity was the same in pts <60 compared to pts >60 yr (42.3% vs 32.4%, p = 0.353).
Conclusions
The continental difference in path response appears mostly driven by differences in age and gender. It remains to be elucidated whether the higher pRRs in elderly pts and pts from AUS can be explained by differences in mutational burden (analysis in progress and will be presented). Our data also indicate that neoadj IPI+NIVO is safe and highly effective in the elderly.
Clinical trial identification
NCT02977052.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Netherlands Cancer Institute.
Funding
BMS.
Disclosure
E.A. Rozeman: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: NanoString. A.M. Menzies: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. R.A. Scolyer: Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Neracare; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. A.C.J. van Akkooi: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck-Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: 4SC. J. Hansson: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. G.V. Long: Advisory / Consultancy: Aduro; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Mass-Array; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche. C.U. Blank: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK; Advisory / Consultancy: GenMab; Research grant / Funding (institution): NanoString. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2494 - CAR-T Nursing Education at a UK Specialist Cancer Hospital
Presenter: Rose Ellard
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2438 - Professional Quality of Life, Perceived Stress and Psychological Resistance Levels of Oncology-Hematology Nurses and the Factors Affecting
Presenter: Tugba Pehlivan
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3541 - Representation of cancer survivors’ preferences in policies for supportive care: Implications for oncology nursing
Presenter: Samantha Mayo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5093 - Vaginal moisturizing post PDR-Pulse Dose Rate Brachytherapy.
Presenter: Pilar Fernández
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1066 - The stomized, chemo and radiotreated patient vs untreated patient: complications and comparison with data literature
Presenter: Cristoforo Ferrero
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1724 - Evaluating the role of clinical nurse specialist
Presenter: Anita Zeneli
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3753 - Role of the Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) in a Functional Unit for Lung cancer at the Catalan Institute of Oncology
Presenter: Isabel Brao
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2676 - A bottom-up approach for prioritising the scientific activities of the Italian Association of Cancer Nurses (AIIAO): rationale and topic identification
Presenter: Valentina Biagioli
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
575 - Investigating quality of care for people with cancer and dementia
Presenter: Naomi Farrington
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5578 - Two years of BRCA1 and BRCA2 somatic External Quality Assessment with Gen&tiss Tiss scheme in France
Presenter: Kelly Dufraing
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract