Abstract 3297
Background
Most therapeutic vaccine clinical trials (CTs) have failed to prove efficacy, even if immunogenicity was confirmed earlier. It was already shown that immune responses generated against multiple antigens are indicative of clinical responses. We aimed to find association between the heterogeneity of immune response and clinical efficacy and, based on this develop a tool that can predict the clinical outcome of cancer vaccines.
Methods
In an extensive literature search we collected the immune- and objective response rates (IRR, ORR) of 94 CTs in which 2,338 patients were treated with 64 different vaccines. Vaccine sequences were used to predict personal epitopes (PEPIs) that bind to at least 3 HLA alleles of the same subject, for all patients of a representative model population. Then we determined the percentage of subjects with at least 1 vaccine specific PEPIs (PEPI Score) and at least 2 vaccine specific PEPIs derived from different antigens (MultiAg PEPI-Score) and compared to the published IRR and ORR.
Results
PEPI Score was able to predict the immunogenicity of therapeutic vaccines; significant correlation was found with IRR (p = 0.002). As expected, no correlation was found between ORR and IRR (p = 0.294), neither between PEPI Score and ORR (p = 0.302), suggesting, that immune response against a single epitope is not enough for efficient tumor response. However, we found that MultiAg PEPI-Score significantly correlates with ORR (p < 0.0001) consistent with earlier findings that the targeting of multiple antigens is required for tumor shrinkage.
Conclusions
Our results demonstrate that both IRR and ORR can be predicted by PEPIs. For clinical efficacy it is crucial to target and generate immune response against multiple antigens. Based on our analysis our computational model is useful and accurate for the prediction of the clinical outcome of cancer vaccines and can even be suitable for rescuing CTs with insufficient or missing responder selection.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
O. Lorincz: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Treos Bio Ltd; Full / Part-time employment: Treos Bio Zrt. J. Toth: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Treos Bio Ltd; Full / Part-time employment: Treos Bio Zrt. M. Megyesi: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Treos Bio Ltd; Full / Part-time employment: Treos Bio Zrt. K. Pántya: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Treos Bio Ltd; Full / Part-time employment: Treos Bio Zrt. E. Somogyi: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Treos Bio Ltd; Full / Part-time employment: Treos Bio Zrt. Z. Csiszovszki: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Treos Bio Ltd; Full / Part-time employment: Treos Bio Zrt. P. Pales: Full / Part-time employment: Treos Bio Zrt. L. Molnar: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Treos Bio Ltd; Full / Part-time employment: Treos Bio Zrt. E.R. Tőke: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Officer / Board of Directors: Treos Bio Ltd; Full / Part-time employment: Treos Bio Zrt. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4370 - Continental differences in pathologic response with neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) plus nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma in the phase 2 OpACIN-neo trial.
Presenter: Irene Reijers
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3230 - Comparable responses of melanoma at primary site and synchronous lymph node metastases upon neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO)
Presenter: Judith Versluis
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3171 - Adjuvant Therapies for Stage III Melanoma: Benchmarks for Bringing Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice
Presenter: Tina HIEKEN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3493 - Mixture-cure modeling for resected stage III/IV melanoma in the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial
Presenter: Jeffrey Weber
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3036 - An open-label, non-randomized, phase IIIb study of trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for patients with unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: a subgroup analysis of patients with brain metastasis
Presenter: Caroline Dutriaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2233 - Adverse event (AE) kinetics in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) in the metastatic and adjuvant setting
Presenter: Jean Jacques Grob
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2435 - A Single Arm, Open Label, Phase II, Multicenter Study to Assess the Detection of the BRAF V600 Mutation on cfDNA from Plasma in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1766 - Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAFV600 Mutation-positive Melanoma in the Real-World Setting – Interim results of the non-interventional COMBI-r study
Presenter: Carola Berking
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2131 - Trial update: A randomized Phase Ib/II study of the selective small molecule Axl inhibitor Bemcentinib (BGB324) in combination with either dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) or pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma
Presenter: Oddbjørn Straume
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4074 - Analysis of pyrexia in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib (D) and/or trametinib (T) across clinical trials
Presenter: Caroline Robert
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract