Abstract 3845
Background
For colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), some key prognostic factors— KRAS/NRAS/BRAF, location of primary tumor, and CA19-9—were identified for recurrence and survival but were rarely included in prognostic scoring system analysis. Besides, tumor burden score (TBS) is a prognostic indicator capturing the cumulative impact CRLM size and CRLM number, but TBS does not take spatial factor—unilobar or bilobar metastasis—into account.
Methods
787 patients undergoing hepatic resection of CRLM were included and were divided into training and validation groups. Modified TBS (mTBS) was established by a mathematical equation (parameters were CRLM size, CRLM number, and unilobar/bilobar metastasis). In the training group, the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent predictors of prognosis; these factors were combined into the Comprehensive Evaluation of Recurrence Risk (CERR) score. The score was compared with Fong score and “Genetic and Morphological Evaluation” (GAME) score and validated in the validation group. Some indices (including C-index, iAUC, Akaike information criterion, net reclassification index, and integrated discrimination improvement) were calculated to compare the discriminatory capacities of three prognostic scoring systems.
Results
mTBS (AUC 0.617) out-performed TBS (AUC 0.568) in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.006). Five preoperative predictors of worse RFS were identified and were incorporated into CERR score: KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutated tumor (1 point); node-positive primary (1 point); extrahepatic disease (1 point); CEA >200 ng/ml or CA19-9 >200 U/mL (1 point); mTBS between 5 and 11 (1 point) or 12 and over (2 points). Patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM were stratified by CERR score into risk groups: high-risk group (CERR score 4 or more) had a 3-year RFS rate of 9.77%; medium-risk group (CERR score 2-3) had a 3-year RFS rate of 21.96%; low-risk group (CERR score 0-1) had a 3-year RFS rate of 39.90%. The validation group showed that the discriminatory capacity of the CERR score was superior to that of the Fong score and the GAME score.
Conclusions
The CERR score is a prognostic tool that can be used to determine optimal clinical management strategies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3330 - Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and BRCA-like status in stage III breast cancer patients treated with intensified carboplatin-based chemotherapy
Presenter: Leonora De Boo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3971 - Unravelling the biological characteristics of MammaPrint extreme risk subgroups
Presenter: Rajith Bhaskaran
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5871 - Residual Cancer burden as a prognostic factor in a large series of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis per molecular surrogated subtypes
Presenter: Catalina Falo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5014 - Clinical validation of CanAssist Breast in a Spanish cohort
Presenter: Manjiri Bakre
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2787 - Meta-analysis on association of pathological complete response with long-term survival outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Peter A. Fasching
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4301 - Immune infiltrate composition across intrinsic subtypes in hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- early breast cancer (BC) enrolled in the prospective LETLOB trial
Presenter: Gaia Griguolo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3205 - Frequency of germline mutations in women's cancer susceptibility genes in a large cohort of Chinese breast cancer patients
Presenter: Ning Liao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4091 - Triple blinded Prospective Study assessing the Impact of Genomics & Artificial Intelligence Watson For Oncology (WFO) on MDT’s Decision of Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Hormone Receptor Positive Early Breast Carcinoma-
Presenter: Somashekhar Sampige Prasannakumar
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4359 - Prognostic significance of Progesterone Receptor levels in luminal-like Her2- early Breast Cancer patients. A retrospective single Cancer Center analysis.
Presenter: Anna Diana
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1369 - PAM50 HER2-enriched subtype and pathological complete response in HER2-positive early breast cancer: a meta-analysis
Presenter: Francesco Schettini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract