Abstract 3845
Background
For colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), some key prognostic factors— KRAS/NRAS/BRAF, location of primary tumor, and CA19-9—were identified for recurrence and survival but were rarely included in prognostic scoring system analysis. Besides, tumor burden score (TBS) is a prognostic indicator capturing the cumulative impact CRLM size and CRLM number, but TBS does not take spatial factor—unilobar or bilobar metastasis—into account.
Methods
787 patients undergoing hepatic resection of CRLM were included and were divided into training and validation groups. Modified TBS (mTBS) was established by a mathematical equation (parameters were CRLM size, CRLM number, and unilobar/bilobar metastasis). In the training group, the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent predictors of prognosis; these factors were combined into the Comprehensive Evaluation of Recurrence Risk (CERR) score. The score was compared with Fong score and “Genetic and Morphological Evaluation” (GAME) score and validated in the validation group. Some indices (including C-index, iAUC, Akaike information criterion, net reclassification index, and integrated discrimination improvement) were calculated to compare the discriminatory capacities of three prognostic scoring systems.
Results
mTBS (AUC 0.617) out-performed TBS (AUC 0.568) in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.006). Five preoperative predictors of worse RFS were identified and were incorporated into CERR score: KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutated tumor (1 point); node-positive primary (1 point); extrahepatic disease (1 point); CEA >200 ng/ml or CA19-9 >200 U/mL (1 point); mTBS between 5 and 11 (1 point) or 12 and over (2 points). Patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM were stratified by CERR score into risk groups: high-risk group (CERR score 4 or more) had a 3-year RFS rate of 9.77%; medium-risk group (CERR score 2-3) had a 3-year RFS rate of 21.96%; low-risk group (CERR score 0-1) had a 3-year RFS rate of 39.90%. The validation group showed that the discriminatory capacity of the CERR score was superior to that of the Fong score and the GAME score.
Conclusions
The CERR score is a prognostic tool that can be used to determine optimal clinical management strategies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4546 - Efficacy and toxicity of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel as induction or palliative treatment in advanced esophageal cancer patients
Presenter: Femke de Man
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5908 - Perioperative chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil and Leucovorin (FLOT) versus Epirubicin, Platinum and Capecitabine or Flourouracil (EOX/ECF) in Resectable Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma- Safety and response data from India.
Presenter: Tanuj Chawla
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
937 - Phase II Study of Preoperative Radiotherapy Combined with S-1 plus Cisplatin in Clinically Resectable Type 4 or Large Type 3 Gastric Cancer: OGSG1205
Presenter: Shunji Endo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1119 - Observational Study of the Peritoneal Washing Cytology Positive Gastric Cancer without Gross Peritoneal Metastasis Underwent Radical D2 Gastrectomy.
Presenter: Jun Eul Hwang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3744 - Primary results of multicenter phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin for locally advanced gastric cancer (Neo G-SOX PII)
Presenter: Akira Miki
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5091 - Multicenter Phase I/II Feasibility Study of Adjuvant Treatment with S-1 in Patients after R0-Resection of Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach and Esophagogastric Junction (GMBH-STO-0114)
Presenter: Kathrin Heinrich
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2891 - A phase I study of Docetaxel/Oxaliplatin/S-1 (DOS) combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction
Presenter: Kei Hosoda
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2994 - Apatinib combined with docetaxel in second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a prospective clinical study (Data updated)
Presenter: Mudan Yang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3000 - A multicenter phase II study of TAS-114 in combination with S-1 in patients with pre-treated advanced gastric cancer (EPOC1604)
Presenter: Daisuke Takahari
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4653 - Impact of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Versus Paclitaxel on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Patients With Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Cancer That Has Progressed After First-Line Chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-061)
Presenter: Eric Van Cutsem
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract