Abstract 3845
Background
For colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), some key prognostic factors— KRAS/NRAS/BRAF, location of primary tumor, and CA19-9—were identified for recurrence and survival but were rarely included in prognostic scoring system analysis. Besides, tumor burden score (TBS) is a prognostic indicator capturing the cumulative impact CRLM size and CRLM number, but TBS does not take spatial factor—unilobar or bilobar metastasis—into account.
Methods
787 patients undergoing hepatic resection of CRLM were included and were divided into training and validation groups. Modified TBS (mTBS) was established by a mathematical equation (parameters were CRLM size, CRLM number, and unilobar/bilobar metastasis). In the training group, the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent predictors of prognosis; these factors were combined into the Comprehensive Evaluation of Recurrence Risk (CERR) score. The score was compared with Fong score and “Genetic and Morphological Evaluation” (GAME) score and validated in the validation group. Some indices (including C-index, iAUC, Akaike information criterion, net reclassification index, and integrated discrimination improvement) were calculated to compare the discriminatory capacities of three prognostic scoring systems.
Results
mTBS (AUC 0.617) out-performed TBS (AUC 0.568) in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.006). Five preoperative predictors of worse RFS were identified and were incorporated into CERR score: KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutated tumor (1 point); node-positive primary (1 point); extrahepatic disease (1 point); CEA >200 ng/ml or CA19-9 >200 U/mL (1 point); mTBS between 5 and 11 (1 point) or 12 and over (2 points). Patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM were stratified by CERR score into risk groups: high-risk group (CERR score 4 or more) had a 3-year RFS rate of 9.77%; medium-risk group (CERR score 2-3) had a 3-year RFS rate of 21.96%; low-risk group (CERR score 0-1) had a 3-year RFS rate of 39.90%. The validation group showed that the discriminatory capacity of the CERR score was superior to that of the Fong score and the GAME score.
Conclusions
The CERR score is a prognostic tool that can be used to determine optimal clinical management strategies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5134 - Early prediction of the platinum-resistant relapse risk using the CA125 modeled kinetic parameter KELIM: a pooled analysis of AGO-OVAR 7 & 9; ICON 7 (AGO/GINECO/ MRC CTU/GCIG trials).
Presenter: OLIVIER COLOMBAN
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4410 - Mirvetuximab soravtansine, a folate receptor alpha (FRa)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in combination with carboplatin and bevacizumab: Initial results from a Phase 1b study in patients (pts) with ovarian cancer
Presenter: David Omalley
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5077 - Response to Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) and Weekly Paclitaxel (wpac) in Platinum Resistant (PR) Ovarian Cancer (OC) by BRCA mutation status
Presenter: Louise Bremer
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3483 - Impact of prior pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) treatment in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC): Sub-group analysis from a randomized, open-label study comparing trabectedin (T) and PLD versus PLD alone in ROC (ET743-OVC-3006)
Presenter: Bradley Monk
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5423 - OCTAVE - A phase I study of enadenotucirev, an oncolytic group B adenovirus, in combination with weekly paclitaxel in platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer
Presenter: Iain McNeish
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1385 - Phase I study of low dose whole abdominal radiation therapy (LDWART) in combination with weekly paclitaxel (wP) for platinum resistant ovarian cancer (PROC)
Presenter: Natalie Ngoi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2090 - Phase 1b/2a study assessing the safety and efficacy of adding AL3818 (Anlotinib) to standard platinum-based chemotherapy in subjects with recurrent or metastatic endometrial, ovarian or cervical carcinoma
Presenter: David Miller
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1960 - Phase I Study of Intraperitoneal TRX-E-002-1 in Subjects with Persistent or Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube or Primary Peritoneal Cancer: Three-month Follow-up Results of the Dose Escalation Phase
Presenter: Jermaine Coward
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4288 - Hybrid capture-based genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with ovarian cancer
Presenter: Mi Yang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3433 - Tumor Microvessel Density for predicting Nintedanib activity: data from the randomized CHIVA trial (a GINECO study)
Presenter: Maud Villemin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract