Abstract 3845
Background
For colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), some key prognostic factors— KRAS/NRAS/BRAF, location of primary tumor, and CA19-9—were identified for recurrence and survival but were rarely included in prognostic scoring system analysis. Besides, tumor burden score (TBS) is a prognostic indicator capturing the cumulative impact CRLM size and CRLM number, but TBS does not take spatial factor—unilobar or bilobar metastasis—into account.
Methods
787 patients undergoing hepatic resection of CRLM were included and were divided into training and validation groups. Modified TBS (mTBS) was established by a mathematical equation (parameters were CRLM size, CRLM number, and unilobar/bilobar metastasis). In the training group, the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent predictors of prognosis; these factors were combined into the Comprehensive Evaluation of Recurrence Risk (CERR) score. The score was compared with Fong score and “Genetic and Morphological Evaluation” (GAME) score and validated in the validation group. Some indices (including C-index, iAUC, Akaike information criterion, net reclassification index, and integrated discrimination improvement) were calculated to compare the discriminatory capacities of three prognostic scoring systems.
Results
mTBS (AUC 0.617) out-performed TBS (AUC 0.568) in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.006). Five preoperative predictors of worse RFS were identified and were incorporated into CERR score: KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutated tumor (1 point); node-positive primary (1 point); extrahepatic disease (1 point); CEA >200 ng/ml or CA19-9 >200 U/mL (1 point); mTBS between 5 and 11 (1 point) or 12 and over (2 points). Patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM were stratified by CERR score into risk groups: high-risk group (CERR score 4 or more) had a 3-year RFS rate of 9.77%; medium-risk group (CERR score 2-3) had a 3-year RFS rate of 21.96%; low-risk group (CERR score 0-1) had a 3-year RFS rate of 39.90%. The validation group showed that the discriminatory capacity of the CERR score was superior to that of the Fong score and the GAME score.
Conclusions
The CERR score is a prognostic tool that can be used to determine optimal clinical management strategies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2376 - Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in patients (pts) with HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm) receiving talazoparib (TALA) vs physician’s choice chemotherapy (PCT) in the EMBRACA trial: A focus on subgroups with/ without visceral disease
Presenter: Johannes Ettl
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4874 - Complete Responses in Patients With 2nd-Line or Greater Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Following First-in-Human Immunotherapy Combining NK and T Cell Activation with Off-the-Shelf High-Affinity CD16 NK Cell Line (haNK)
Presenter: Chaitali Nangia
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4362 - Reproducibility and concordance of 4 clinically developed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)
Presenter: Aurelia Noske
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4528 - Systemic Therapy in 2nd-Line Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC): A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and Meta-Analysis (MA) of Efficacy
Presenter: Peter Kaufman
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4112 - Cisplatin given at three divided doses for three consecutive days in metastatic breast cancer: an alternative schedule for one full dose with comparable efficacy but less CINV and hypomagnesaemia
Presenter: Yang Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5699 - Patterns and predictors of first-line (1L) taxane use in US patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)
Presenter: Joyce O’Shaughnessy
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1931 - Maintenance Chemotherapy is effective in Patients with Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer After First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy
Presenter: Jian Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4696 - Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to investigate symptom burden enrichment in Stage IV patients at an academic center
Presenter: Madeline Matthys
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4582 - Measures of functional status in adults aged ≥70 years with advanced breast cancer (ABC) receiving palbociclib (PAL) combination therapy in POLARIS
Presenter: Meghan Karuturi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3565 - Real-World 1-Year Survival Analysis of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer with Liver or Lung Metastasis Treated with Eribulin, Gemcitabine or Capecitabine
Presenter: Shayma Kazmi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract