Abstract 3845
Background
For colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), some key prognostic factors— KRAS/NRAS/BRAF, location of primary tumor, and CA19-9—were identified for recurrence and survival but were rarely included in prognostic scoring system analysis. Besides, tumor burden score (TBS) is a prognostic indicator capturing the cumulative impact CRLM size and CRLM number, but TBS does not take spatial factor—unilobar or bilobar metastasis—into account.
Methods
787 patients undergoing hepatic resection of CRLM were included and were divided into training and validation groups. Modified TBS (mTBS) was established by a mathematical equation (parameters were CRLM size, CRLM number, and unilobar/bilobar metastasis). In the training group, the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent predictors of prognosis; these factors were combined into the Comprehensive Evaluation of Recurrence Risk (CERR) score. The score was compared with Fong score and “Genetic and Morphological Evaluation” (GAME) score and validated in the validation group. Some indices (including C-index, iAUC, Akaike information criterion, net reclassification index, and integrated discrimination improvement) were calculated to compare the discriminatory capacities of three prognostic scoring systems.
Results
mTBS (AUC 0.617) out-performed TBS (AUC 0.568) in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.006). Five preoperative predictors of worse RFS were identified and were incorporated into CERR score: KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutated tumor (1 point); node-positive primary (1 point); extrahepatic disease (1 point); CEA >200 ng/ml or CA19-9 >200 U/mL (1 point); mTBS between 5 and 11 (1 point) or 12 and over (2 points). Patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM were stratified by CERR score into risk groups: high-risk group (CERR score 4 or more) had a 3-year RFS rate of 9.77%; medium-risk group (CERR score 2-3) had a 3-year RFS rate of 21.96%; low-risk group (CERR score 0-1) had a 3-year RFS rate of 39.90%. The validation group showed that the discriminatory capacity of the CERR score was superior to that of the Fong score and the GAME score.
Conclusions
The CERR score is a prognostic tool that can be used to determine optimal clinical management strategies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2107 - Role of Individualized Intervention(s) on Quality of Life (QOL) and Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer (BC): MyChoice Study
Presenter: Shahid Ahmed
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5812 - Correlation between the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, immune cell subsets in tumor stroma and response to systemic therapy in breast cancer
Presenter: Cvetka Grasic Kuhar
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4734 - BRCA1/2 Testing in HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC): Results from the European Component of a Multi-Country Real World Study
Presenter: Michael Patrick Lux
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1686 - In vitro and in vivo rescue of resistance to BET inhibitors by targeting PLK1 in triple negative breast cancer.
Presenter: Cristina Nieto-jiménez
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5020 - Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in combination with melatonin and metformin in locally advanced breast cancer
Presenter: Tatiana Semiglazova
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5082 - Melatonin and metformin in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer
Presenter: Tatiana Semiglazova
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2642 - Patient-tailored tamoxifen dosing based on an increased quantitative understanding of its complex pharmacokinetics: A novel integrative modelling approach
Presenter: Anna Mueller-Schoell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2461 - Lack of benefit of neoadjuvant pertuzumab in high risk HER2 positive breast cancer. A retrospective case-control study of 355 cases with biomarker analysis.
Presenter: Manuela Tiako Meyo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4776 - Targeting CDCA3 to improve chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer patients
Presenter: Kenneth O'Byrne
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1674 - Activity of BET-proteolysis targeting chimeric (PROTAC) compounds in triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: María Del Mar Noblejas López
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract