Abstract 4442
Background
Real-world (rw) evidence derived from electronic health records (EHRs) is being explored for use as a comparator to single arm clinical trials in oncology. While RECIST is a standard for assessing tumor response in trials, alternative approaches are needed in rw cohorts. Our objective was to examine whether rwRR derived from abstracted “real-world tumor response” (rwTR) might perform similarly to RECIST-based response rates in a variety of settings to support assessments of drug efficacy.
Methods
We focused on randomized clinical trials supporting FDA approvals in aNSCLC between 2015-2017 (4 trials, 5 arms). We selected rw cohorts of aNSCLC patients from de-identified Flatiron Health EHR-derived database by applying the eligibility criteria of each trial as feasible, following an established internal process; trials were considered infeasible for comparison and not reported when fewer than 30 eligible rw patients were identified at the time of analyses. rwTR was abstracted from unstructured clinical notes and was based on the treating oncologist’s assessment of disease change (e.g., partial response) indicated by imaging at each point of radiographic disease evaluation. We compared the rwRRs observed in rw cohorts to objective response rates (ORRs) from trials.
Results
rw cohorts included 862 patients, and clinical trial cohorts (2 control arms and 3 experimental arms) included 701 patients, see response rates in the table (all except ALEX were confirmed RRs).Table:
1581P
Trial | Trial arm | ORR | rwRR |
---|---|---|---|
CheckMate-017 | E: Nivolumab / 2L+ squamous | 20% (27/135) | 25% (17/68) |
CheckMate-057 | E: Nivolumab / 2L+ nonsquamous | 19% (56/292) | 17% (51/294) |
KEYNOTE-021 | E: Carboplatin, Pembrolizumab, Pemetrexed/ 1L nonsquamous | 55% (33/60) | 42% (37/88) |
KEYNOTE-021 | C: Carboplatin and Pemetrexed/ 1L nonsquamous | 29% (18/63) | 34% (101/294) |
ALEX | C: Crizotinib/ 1L | 75% (114/151) | 68% (80/118) |
Conclusions
Data curated from EHRs of rw patients with aNSCLC can provide estimates of response rates that are comparable to RECIST-based response rates observed in similar patient populations studied in clinical trial settings. These findings demonstrate the potential of leveraging rw cohorts as a comparator to single arm clinical trials in oncology.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Flatiron Health, Inc.
Funding
Flatiron Health Inc., independent subsidiary of the Roche group.
Disclosure
X. Ma: Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group.: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. N.C. Nussbaum: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group.: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. K. Magee: Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. A.B. Bourla: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. M. Tucker: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group.: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. L. Bellomo: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. C. Bennette: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment, Flatiron Health, Inc. is an independent subsidiary of the Roche Group.: Flatiron Health, Inc.; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche.
Resources from the same session
2935 - Correlation of progression free survival-2 and overall survival in solid tumors
Presenter: Paul Mainwaring
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2273 - High performance of serial tumor biopsies in first in human (FIH) phase I trials.
Presenter: Jun Sato
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5933 - Response rates and lesion-level progression patterns of solid tumor patients in an academic phase 1 program: implications for tumor heterogeneity
Presenter: Christopher Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3569 - Clinical Benefit and Response Rate in Early Phase Clinical Trials: First Report from a Single-Institution Study
Presenter: Antonio Marra
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4139 - Patient (pt) selection for immunotherapeutic early-phase clinical trials (ieCTs): a single Phase I Unit experience
Presenter: Matteo Simonelli
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4451 - Improving patient selection for immuno-oncology phase 1 trials: an external validation of five prognostic scores at Claudius Regaud Institute of Toulouse, Oncopôle (IUCT-O).
Presenter: Ghassan Al Darazi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1696 - Demonstrating the Changing Trends in Phase 1 Clinical Trials
Presenter: Christina Guo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3202 - Participation of Women in phase 1 oncology clinical trials
Presenter: Laura Vidal
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4518 - Predictors for early trial discontinuation of patients with cancer participating in phase I clinical trials
Presenter: Joeri Douma
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4368 - Safety of Tumor Treating Fields delivery to the torso: Meta analysis from TTFields clinical trials
Presenter: Federica Grosso
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract