Abstract 3280
Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading cancer with the 55% survival rate. The analysis of tumor microenviroment in fresh surgical samples by flow cytometry focuses on the presence of immune cells. However, no direct access to fresh tumor sample is always possible. Moreover, transport of interesting fresh tumor tissue specimens to distant labs is sometimes neccesary. Therefore, we analyzed both fresh and frozen cells isolated from tumor tissue, stored in hibernation buffer for 1 to 3 days and compared the percentage of EpCAM+, CD45+ and CD3+ cells. We analyzed 26 surgical samples of primary CRC and metastatic samples.
Methods
Surgical samples were obtained from patients with CRC and processed for an isolation of a single cell suspension (SCS) prepared using standard protocol with collagenase. After washing and blocking with mouse serum, cells were stained with fluorescently labeled antibodies (EpCAM-PE, CD45-FITC, CD3-APC). The cells were phenotyped using the FACS ARIAII instrument. Samples were obtained from freshly prepared (n = 19) and frozen cells, stored in DMSO supplemented medium (n = 8). 1 sample was phenotyped both from freshly prepared and frozen cells.
Results
From freshly prepared SCS, the average amount of EpCAM+ and CD45+ cells was 78.7% and 14.7%, respectively. In 12 out of 19 cases we also used anti CD3 antibodies. 2% of infiltrated cells were found to be positive for CD3. When using frozen SCS, we detected a higher positivity for EpCAM (92.85%), CD45 (62%) and CD3 (6%) compared to freshly prepared SCS.
Conclusions
We phenotyped human CRC samples for EpCAM, CD45 and some samples for CD3 marker. We found that for the FACS analysis, the stability of tumor tissue samples seems to be acceptable for isolation of SCS from CRC if stored in hibernation buffer, at 4 °C for 1 to 3 days. When isolated SCS from frozen stocks were used, we detected higher percentages of positive cells for EpCAM, CD45, CD3 markers. Therefore, we do not recommend to compare freshly isolated cells with previously frozen cells in FACS experiments.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
grants APVV (no.16–0066), VEGA (no. 1/0380/18).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4614 - Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Naïve and Ipilimumab-Refractory Melanoma
Presenter: Domenico Mallardo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2901 - IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio as predictive biomarker for response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients
Presenter: Emilio Giunta
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2306 - Multiplex Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Spatial Analysis of Checkpoint-Positive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs)
Presenter: Scott Ely
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1678 - The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Presenter: Alberto Carretero-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5138 - Radiomic Features as a Non-invasive Biomarker to Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Presenter: Kye Jin Park
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5800 - Integrative combination of high-plex digital profiling techniques and cluster analysis to reveal complex immune biology in the tumor microenvironment of mesothelioma
Presenter: Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5736 - Predictive factors of response to immunotherapy in 198 patients with metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer (mNSCLC): real world data from 2 university hospitals in Spain
Presenter: Juan Felipe Cordoba Ortega
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5645 - Evaluating Lung CT Density Changes Among Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Treated with Thoracic Radiotherapy (TRT) alone or TRT Followed by Combined Ipilimumab (IPI) and Nivolumab (NIVO).
Presenter: Kujtim Latifi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1540 - Immuno-oncology therapy biomarkers differences between polyoma-virus positive and negative Merkel cell carcinomas
Presenter: Zoran Gatalica
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4538 - Can we improve patient selection for phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1) based on Immuno-Oncology score prognostic index (VIO)?
Presenter: Ignacio Matos Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract