Abstract 5614
Background
Highly myelosuppressive chemotherapy (HMC) is the standard treatment for several types of sarcoma. Severe neutropenia is a common adverse event, which can lead to febrile neutropenia (FN) and major infections requiring hospitalization, with up to 15% mortality rate. Several trials showed an equal efficacy of filgrastim (F) and Peg-filgrastim (Peg-F) for preventing FN in many cancer types, but limited evidence is available in adult sarcoma patients (pts). We retrospectively compared the incidence of FN and hospitalization due to neutropenic infections in sarcoma pts treated with HMC with the support of either F or Peg-F.
Methods
We reviewed data of pts consecutively treated in our institution from Sep 2014 to Mar 2019. Inclusion criteria were: age >18 years; diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma; at least 1 cycle of HMC supported by prophylactic F or Peg-F. Included HMC regimens were: doxorubicin ≥60 mg/m² (D) + ifosfamide ≥9 g/m² (IFO) +/- vincristine; high-dose IFO (≥12 g/m); IFO ≥9 g/m² + etoposide. Neutropenia prophylaxis included F (5-7 doses) or Peg-F (1 dose) according to physician‘s choice. χ2-Test was used to compare the outcomes; p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
79 pts were found eligible, receiving 330 cycles of HMC. F and peg-F were used as prophylaxis in 66.6% (n = 220) and 33.3% (n = 110) of cases, respectively. The rate of FN was higher in the Peg-F group compared to the F group (11.8% vs 6.8, p = 0.12), while the rate of cycles complicated by a hospitalization was 9% and 3.2% (p = 0.02), respectively. 8/16 hospitalizations were due to pneumonia. One death during hospitalization occurred in the Peg-F group. 70% of hospitalizations occurred in metastatic pts, whereas 30% occurred during adjuvant treatments.
Conclusions
The use of peg-F was associated with a significantly higher rate of neutropenic infections requiring hospitalization compared with F in adult sarcoma pts receiving HMC. FN rate was numerically higher in pts receiving peg-F, not reaching statistical significance. These data suggest that F prophylaxis may be preferred in this setting to peg-F. Overall, prophylaxis with both agents provided a relatively low rate of hospitalizations and FN, compared with the myelosuppressive potential of the regimens.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
860 - Dose differential modulation of the autophagic behavior of estrogen expressing breast carcinoma cells
Presenter: Mariam Fouad
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2304 - Synthetic peptide of tumor–associated antigen L6 formulated with polymer-based adjuvant enhances anti-tumor effects in mice
Presenter: Shih-jen Liu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4419 - Improving detection level of somatic mosaicism in neurofibromatosis type 1
Presenter: Kristina Karandasheva
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5283 - Preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship of ABN401, a highly selective Met inhibitor, in gastric and non-small-cell lung cancer models
Presenter: JooSeok Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5488 - Transcription factors of Snail family in the regulation of resistance of breast cancer cells to hypoxic conditions
Presenter: Alvina Khamidullina
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5417 - Metastasis is impaired by endothelial-specific Dll4 loss-of-function through inhibition of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and reduction of cancer stem cells and circulating tumour cells
Presenter: Liliana Mendonça
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5494 - Identification of novel and known FGFR gene fusions in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Weixin Zhao
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3412 - WNT pathway mutations (APC/CTNNB1) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) response in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1815 - Leukocytosis as a negative prognostic factor in patients with lung cancer: Which subpopulation of leukocytes is responsible?
Presenter: Filip Kohutek
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5022 - Identification of MET gene amplifications using next-generation sequencing in non-small cell lung cancer patients
Presenter: Sergi Clavé
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract