Abstract 2760
Background
TMB is an emerging biomarker for immune-therapy including metastasized UBC. The evaluation of reliable methods to determine the TMB value is a prerequisite for successful application of IO therapies.
Methods
TMB was assessed in genomic DNA from 39 muscle-invasive UBC by whole genome sequencing (GPS Cancer©, NantHealth). In 45 cases sequencing with the TruSight Oncology 500, (TSO500, Illumina) was performed. Immune cell (IC) infiltrates were analyzed by CD3, CD8, CD56, PD-1 and CD68 immunohistochemistry. PD-L1 status was evaluated by the SP263 assay (Ventana). Intrinsic subtypes (MDACC-approach) were assessed via a Nanostring-assay. Immune phenotypes were assessed by (I) spatial distribution of IC and (II) a T-cell inflammation related gene expression signature consisting of 29 genes (Nanostring). Results were validated in the TCGA MIBC cohort.
Results
Correlation between TSO500 and WGS revealed high concordance (spearman-correlation: r = 0.68, p < 0.0001). Overall percentage agreement was 76.9% for a cut-off of 10 mut/mb and 84.6% for 15 mut/mb. We found no significant association of high TMB at different cut-offs (10 mut/mb, 15 mut/mb) with inflammation status and different immune cell populations in both cohorts. TMB was not associated with intrinsic subtypes. Spatially distributed IC phenotypes or PD-L1 status was not associated with TMB. Hierarchical clustering of all factors revealed four distinct subgroups: Cluster A Inflamed, PD-L1 “high”, TMB high (n = 5); Cluster B Inflamed, PD-L1 “high”, TMB low-intermediate (n = 14); Cluster C: Uninflamed, PD-L1 “low”, TMB intermediate-high (n = 14); Cluster D Uninflamed, PD-L1 “low”, TMB low (n = 12).
Conclusions
This study provides insights into the reliability of a NGS panel for the prediction of TMB in MIBC which shows comparable performance to WGS. High TMB seems to be a characteristic of MIBC which occurs regardless of PD-L1 and inflammation status. TMB could possibly identify additional patients who do not fulfill the PD-L1 assessment based criteria for checkpoint inhibition.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Illumina, California, United States of America NantHealth, Culver City, California, United States of America.
Disclosure
M. Eckstein: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen-Cilag. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4370 - Continental differences in pathologic response with neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) plus nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma in the phase 2 OpACIN-neo trial.
Presenter: Irene Reijers
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3230 - Comparable responses of melanoma at primary site and synchronous lymph node metastases upon neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO)
Presenter: Judith Versluis
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3171 - Adjuvant Therapies for Stage III Melanoma: Benchmarks for Bringing Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice
Presenter: Tina HIEKEN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3493 - Mixture-cure modeling for resected stage III/IV melanoma in the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial
Presenter: Jeffrey Weber
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3036 - An open-label, non-randomized, phase IIIb study of trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for patients with unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: a subgroup analysis of patients with brain metastasis
Presenter: Caroline Dutriaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2233 - Adverse event (AE) kinetics in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) in the metastatic and adjuvant setting
Presenter: Jean Jacques Grob
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2435 - A Single Arm, Open Label, Phase II, Multicenter Study to Assess the Detection of the BRAF V600 Mutation on cfDNA from Plasma in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1766 - Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAFV600 Mutation-positive Melanoma in the Real-World Setting – Interim results of the non-interventional COMBI-r study
Presenter: Carola Berking
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2131 - Trial update: A randomized Phase Ib/II study of the selective small molecule Axl inhibitor Bemcentinib (BGB324) in combination with either dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) or pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma
Presenter: Oddbjørn Straume
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4074 - Analysis of pyrexia in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib (D) and/or trametinib (T) across clinical trials
Presenter: Caroline Robert
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract