Abstract 2323
Background
It is well documented that survival of CRC is dependent on early diagnosis. In England, the Department of Health’s cancer policy states that patients with symptoms of suspected cancer must be seen and assessed by the specialist team within 2 weeks of a referral by their General Practitioner (GP). The traditional 2 week wait (2ww) referral route involves these patients being seen in clinic within 2 weeks, where they are assessed and an investigation is booked, taking up to 4 weeks for first investigation and diagnosis. We have introduced a novel Straight to Test / CTAP for these patients, which rationalises the patient journey, ensuring that the patient has the right test first time, without delay.
Methods
Our service is a Consultant Nurse led Straight to Test / CTAP. All 2ww patients referred by the GP with suspected CRC are assessed via the CTAP. Upon receipt of the electronic referral from their GP, a colorectal assessment is carried out via telephone within 48 hours of referral by the Consultant nurse or a member or her specialist nursing team. The patient is then triaged for the most appropriate investigation, according to a protocol, which is then booked within 2 weeks of the GPs referral.
Results
The CTAP has been running now for 5 years with over 4000 patients being assessed via this route. In 2017 & 2018 the cancer yield from our service was 4% which matches that of traditional out-patient assessments routes. However we were able to reduce the patient pathway by 10 days by the introduction of the CTAP. 70% of patients had an endoscopy procedure as their first investigation and 28% had a radiological investigation (usually CT Colonography). 90% of patients had their diagnosis or given the all clear by day 14.
Conclusions
This pathway has significantly shortened the patient’s pathway and time diagnosis for our patients, meaning that those patients with CRC are diagnosed by day 14. Patients with other pathologies are also diagnosed quicker and those patients with no serious pathology are reassured and discharged back to their GP We have managed to reduce waiting times from referral to diagnosis and to ensure all patients on the 2ww pathway have a more streamline patient focused experience, avoiding unnecessary hospital visits.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2743 - The Impact of Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapy in Melanoma Brain Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Presenter: Mario Mandala
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5479 - Intracranial Anti-Tumor Activity in Melanoma Brain Metastases with Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib: A Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis
Presenter: Jose Lutzky
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3560 - Outcomes of Patients with Melanoma Brain Metastases (MBM) Treated with Standard of Care Therapy After Being Excluded from MBM-Specific Clinical Trials
Presenter: Kourtney Holbrook
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3175 - The analysis of current treatment outcomes in melanoma patients with brain metastases
Presenter: Joanna Placzke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4550 - A multivariate model to define prognostic groups among patients with melanoma brain metastases: a 10-year retrospective cohort study
Presenter: Giacomo Pelizzari
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4191 - The immune landscape of melanoma significantly influences survival in patients with highly mutated tumors.
Presenter: Robert Ferguson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1625 - Final Results from Phase II of Combination with Canerpaturev (formerly HF10), an Oncolytic Viral Immunotherapy, and Ipilimumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma in 2nd-or later line treatment
Presenter: Kenji Yokota
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5346 - Evaluating polygenic risk score prediction model for melanoma prognosis
Presenter: Miriam Potrony
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5477 - Impact of sarcopenia in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy
Presenter: Maria Grazia Vitale
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3469 - Ancillary evaluation of systemic immune antitumor response (SIAR) and tumor growth rate (TGR) of patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (MM) treated with radiotherapy (RT) combined with ipilimumab (ipi) in the phase 1 study Mel-Ipi-Rx.
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract