Abstract 4587
Background
Despite the accumulation of knowledge on the cognitive side-effects of chemotherapy, the actual incidence of this impairment is still a subject of research. Estimates of affected patients vary from 17% to 78% across studies.In recent years, growing attention is being paid to the potential adverse effects of chemotherapy on brain and cognitive function. Despite the accumulation of knowledge on the cognitive side-effects of chemotherapy, the actual incidence of this impairment is still a subject of research. Estimates of affected patients vary from 17% to 78% across studies. The aim of the study is to evaluate cognitive function changes experienced by cancer patients who receive chemotherapy and associated factors.
Methods
This is a descriptive study. The data collection phase of the study is ongoing and the results obtained from 47 patients who received chemotherapy have been reported here. The results of the large group will be presented at the congress. Data collection was started on March 2019 and will be continuing until September 2019. This study was conducted in a Research and Training Hospital in Istanbul/Turkey. Data were collected by using the Patient İnformation form and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy- Cognitive Function (FACIT-Cog) and The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman Correlation analysis were used to evaluate the data.
Results
There was statistically significant and positive relationship between FACIT-Cog “perceived cognitive impairments” subscale and EORTC-30 cognitive (r = 0,755; p ≤ 0,001), emotional (r = 0,505; p = 0,001) and social (r = 0,504; p = 0,001) functioning subscales. There was statistically significant and positive relationship between FACIT-Cog “comments from others on cognitive function” and EORTC-30 emotional (r = 0,491; p = 0,001), cognitive (r = 0,539; p ≤ 0,001), and social (r = 0,588; p ≤ 0,001) functioning subscales. FACIT-Cog scores was not significantly differ by patients’ characteristics (p > 0,005).
Conclusions
Cognitive function should be assessed and considered during the care of cancer patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract